ALSO READ | Singapore bets SUSD 220 million on fintech just as the money dries up  

The move comes as Gulf states accelerate diversification beyond hydrocarbons, creating opportunities in infrastructure, energy transition, logistics, technology, and advanced industries. Saudi Arabia’s Vision 2030 programme and the UAE’s efforts to develop finance, technology, and industrial sectors have attracted large pools of international and regional capital.

For Temasek, establishing a permanent presence is also a shift from its earlier approach of assessing the region largely from outside. Chairman Teo Chee Hean said in June that the investment company was actively looking at a Middle East office, while stressing that new locations had to be justified by investment opportunities rather than geographical coverage.

“We do not have an office, for example, right now in the Middle East, and we are actively looking at that and finding the right time to do so,” Teo told The Business Times. He said Temasek needed to be in markets where it believed there were opportunities to deploy capital.

The decision follows years of increasing engagement. In March 2025, Seviora Group, Temasek’s wholly owned asset-management platform, opened its first Middle East office in Abu Dhabi Global Market. Seviora said the office would help it tap the region’s expanding asset-management industry.

Temasek has also been building relationships with major Gulf institutions. In May, it joined BlackRock’s Global Infrastructure Partners, Abu Dhabi’s L’IMAD, and Abu Dhabi National Oil Company in a proposed infrastructure investment partnership targeting up to USD 30 billion across the Gulf and Central Asia.

The partnership targets energy, transportation, logistics, digital infrastructure, water, and waste management.

The new offices come as Temasek seeks to increase exposure to Europe, the Middle East, and Africa. The three regions accounted for about 12% of its portfolio as of March 2026, mostly in Europe. In July, Temasek said it had invested about 13 billion euros in EMEA over the previous two years and was targeting up to about 17 billion euros in the region by 2029.

The expansion is part of a broader effort to build an investment pipeline across markets being reshaped by energy transition, infrastructure development, industrial policy, and technology. Temasek has also indicated greater interest in sectors such as defense, particularly in Europe, as geopolitical considerations increasingly influence investment decisions.

ALSO READ | Battle of wealth hubs: Singapore unveils fund manager tax breaks to counter Hong Kong

That geopolitical backdrop makes the timing notable. The Gulf and wider Middle East have been affected by the ongoing conflict involving Iran, with consequences for energy markets, trade routes, and investor risk assessments.

Gulf financial centres have nevertheless continued to attract international asset managers and sovereign investors.

The conflict impacted Temasek’s own portfolio.

In its latest annual results, the company said events in the Middle East caused a 2% net portfolio value drawdown in the final month of its financial year, partly reversing earlier gains in its global direct investments portfolio.

Despite those risks, Temasek continues to view the region through a long-term investment lens.

The expansion will give investment teams closer access to sovereign wealth funds, institutional investors, family offices, and companies. It should also improve local sourcing and due diligence.

Chia Song Hwee, chief executive of Temasek Global Investments, has been appointed chairman for the Middle East and Africa, while Ankit Khemka remains managing director for the region. Chia said being on the ground would allow Temasek to deepen engagement with partners and bring complementary expertise from across its investment ecosystem to regional markets.

The new offices will also expand Temasek’s global network. The company currently has 13 offices across nine countries, including Singapore, China, India, the UK, France, Belgium, the US, and Mexico.

Once operational, Abu Dhabi and Riyadh will expand the network to 15 offices across 11 countries by 2027.

The move comes as competition for Gulf capital and strategic partnerships intensifies. Regional sovereign wealth funds are seeking global opportunities while international investors seek access to Gulf-led projects and private markets.

For Temasek, the two offices could therefore serve a dual purpose: helping it deploy more capital locally while connecting Gulf opportunities with its wider portfolio and global network.

The company’s record SUSD 518 billion net portfolio value as of March 2026 gives it substantial financial capacity, although its stated approach remains focused on long-term, sustainable returns rather than simply expanding assets or geographic reach.

The offices will formalise a strategy built through investments, fund relationships, and portfolio-company activity. That could deepen regional deal flow. It also brings decisions closer to prospective partners regionally.

The 10-year yield had already been rising for several months, with the latest increase bringing it roughly one percentage point above its level before the outbreak of the Iran war, according to reports.

The sell-off has affected long-duration Treasury investments particularly sharply. BlackRock’s iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF touched its lowest intraday level since its launch in 2002, underlining the pressure on investors holding longer-maturity government debt.

The rise in yields is significant for asset allocation. When government bonds offer higher returns, they become more competitive with equities, particularly shares whose valuations depend on expectations of strong earnings growth far into the future.

Pressure on equities
US stock markets have come under pressure as investors weigh higher borrowing costs against elevated equity valuations. The S&P 500, Dow Jones Industrial Average and Nasdaq Composite all closed lower on Monday.

The S&P 500 fell 0.5%, while the Dow declined 0.3 per cent and the Nasdaq dropped 0.6%. The declines reflected both the rise in Treasury yields and weakness in technology and artificial intelligence-related shares.

Higher yields can weigh on growth stocks because future earnings are discounted at a higher rate.

This reduces the present value investors assign to profits expected years ahead.

Companies that rely heavily on borrowing may also face increased financing costs, potentially affecting investment and expansion plans.

The impact is not limited to Wall Street. Higher US Treasury yields can influence capital flows globally, affecting emerging-market currencies, government bonds and equity markets. Countries and companies that borrow in dollars may face additional pressure if US yields rise alongside a stronger dollar.

The treasury seeks to contain costs
US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has made long-term borrowing costs a key measure of the administration’s economic success. The Treasury has responded by increasing bond buybacks and considering measures to manage the supply of longer-dated debt.

The administration has also encouraged Japan to curb Treasury sales and opened the door to potentially reducing issuance of long-maturity bonds.

However, the measures have so far had limited effect. The 10-year yield continued to climb despite the Treasury’s efforts, suggesting that investors remain focused on inflation, fiscal deficits and the broader supply-demand balance in the bond market.

The challenge is particularly acute because higher yields increase the government’s cost of servicing its debt.

As existing bonds mature and are refinanced, elevated interest rates can gradually translate into higher interest payments, placing additional pressure on public finances.

Fed decision in focus
The Federal Reserve’s decision this week will be closely watched for clues about the future path of interest rates. Investors will assess whether policymakers view the oil-driven inflation risks as temporary or as a threat to broader price stability.

A central bank that signals a willingness to keep rates higher could reinforce pressure on the long end of the Treasury curve. Conversely, reassurance that inflation remains under control could encourage bond buying and ease yields.

For now, the 5% threshold has become a test of investor confidence. If yields remain above that level, borrowing costs could stay elevated across the economy, increasing pressure on businesses, households and governments.

The breach does not automatically signal an economic crisis. But it indicates that the bond market is demanding greater compensation for inflation uncertainty, heavy borrowing and the risks surrounding the global economic outlook.

As investors wait for the Federal Reserve’s next move, the question is whether 5 per cent will mark a temporary spike or the beginning of a more sustained period of higher long-term borrowing costs.

Invest Hong Kong (InvestHK) has established consultant offices in Cairo and Izmir, while the Hong Kong government is pursuing the creation of “Economic and Trade Offices” in Saudi Arabia and Malaysia.

The strategy reflects a broader shift in Hong Kong’s international economic policy as companies and investors reassess supply chains, capital allocation and market access amid geopolitical fragmentation.

Hong Kong’s Economic and Trade Office in Dubai already covers all six GCC economies — Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the UAE — and has been operating as the city’s official representative in the region since 2021.

InvestHK’s Cairo office covers Egypt as well as Algeria, Iraq, Jordan, Lebanon, Libya, Morocco, Tunisia and Iran, while its Istanbul operation covers Turkey. The network is designed to bring Middle Eastern and North African capital and companies into Hong Kong while helping Hong Kong businesses enter those markets.

The Hong Kong retail tranche was covered 5.63 times and the international tranche 2.59 times, modest by the standards of an exchange where hot deals are routinely subscribed hundreds of times over.

The offering represented about 6.6% of enlarged share capital, cornerstone investors took roughly a fifth of it and are locked up for six months, which leaves only about 5% genuinely trading.

Cornerstones committed about USD 383 million and included existing backers Boyu Capital, Tiger Global and General Atlantic, alongside Tencent, Greenwoods, Taikang Life and UBS Asset Management. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and JPMorgan sponsored the listing.

A thin float held up largely by insiders is not a vote of confidence from the wider market. It is a deal engineered to get done.

The loophole was the moat
Shein’s cost advantage was never purely operational. A large part of it was regulatory. Packages worth up to USD 800 once entered the United States free of duty under the de minimis rule, and that relief has gone.

The European Union followed, agreeing a fixed 3 euro customs duty on parcels valued under 150 euro from July 1 2026, with an additional Union Handling Fee due from November 1 2026.

France, which pushed hardest for the change, will also bar influencers from promoting ultra-fast fashion brands from January 2027.

The scale involved explains the political urgency. The number of low-value e-commerce packages arriving in the bloc doubled in a single year to 4.6 billion, more than nine in ten of them from China, and France alone took in roughly 800 million small parcels.

Brussels had planned to close the exemption in 2028 and brought it forward under pressure from domestic retailers.

The effect on the accounts was immediate. Shein reported first-quarter revenue of USD 9.05 billion and swung to a net loss of USD 99 million from a profit a year earlier, reversing USD 395 million of net income in the same quarter of 2025.

The company has guided first-half revenue growth broadly in line with the 1.1% it managed in the first quarter, with the operating margin slightly lower, blaming new European import charges, pricing pressure and softer demand in the Middle East linked to the Iran war.

The arithmetic underneath
Strip out the noise and the deceleration is stark. Revenue grew 41.1% in 2023, then 20.7% in 2024, then 8% in 2025, reaching USD 41.85 billion, while earnings fell almost 39% to USD 2.06 billion.

What makes this more than a cyclical wobble is where the money goes. Between 2023 and 2025 net revenue grew by USD 9.744 billion. Fulfilment absorbed USD 5.6 billion of that increase and marketing took USD 2.7 billion, leaving USD 335 million of additional operating profit, or roughly 3.4 cents on every extra dollar of sales.

That is the number investors are actually pricing. Growth at those incremental economics is close to worthless.

Crucially, this is not a collapse in pricing power at the product level. Gross margin held at roughly 68% in 2025 and around 70% in the first quarter.

The products still carry a healthy mark-up.

It is the cost of getting each parcel to each doorstep, plus the cost of persuading the customer to open the app in the first place, that has swallowed the profit. Duties simply added a third claim on the same dollar.

Who owns it, and who can sell
The share structure deserves attention from anyone tempted by the discount. The shares sold carry one-tenth of the voting rights of founder-held stock, and co-founders Sky Yangtian Xu, Maggie Gu, Molly Miao and Tony Ren control 90% of votes.

They retain close to 60% of the company, locked for 24 months. Shein has also agreed to pay up to about USD 3.5 billion in cash to investors who bought special shares in earlier private rounds, which is money leaving the business to settle the consequences of those older, richer valuations.

Jianggan Li of the consultancy Momentum Works called the deal a capital-structure event as much as a fundraising.

Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Catherine Lim has noted that with pre-IPO and cornerstone holders all accepting six-month lock-ups, the expiry in March 2027 will be a far more meaningful test of the company’s worth than the debut session. That is the date to diary.

Hong Kong was the only door left
The venue is itself part of the analysis.

Shein filed in the United States in 2023, then turned to London, where the Financial Conduct Authority approved a draft prospectus before China’s securities regulator objected, largely over how the company described risks tied to its Chinese operations and Xinjiang.

Beijing signed off on the Hong Kong route in July, and there is no US listing and no depositary receipt. The company moved its headquarters to Singapore in 2022, but the listing has anchored its identity back where its supply chain always was.

The regulatory file is not closed either.

Shein has disclosed an ongoing US Federal Trade Commission consumer protection investigation that could carry significant penalties, and the European Commission is examining its handling of illegal products, the potentially addictive design of its platform and the transparency of its recommendation systems.

For Western institutions with mandates that limit Hong Kong exposure or that screen on labour and environmental grounds, the practical result is a narrower pool of natural buyers. That is a structural discount, not a sentiment one.

What has to be proved next
The bull case is not empty. Shein counted 281 million active users at the end of March and turned its inventory in just 36 days in 2025 under its small-batch testing model, a speed advantage that no customs rule can legislate away.

The prospectus points to marketplace and supply chain services for other brands, building on its 2023 purchase of the Missguided name from Frasers Group and its partnership with the French label Pimkie, and 40% of proceeds are earmarked for technology with another 40% for brand building.

The bear case is simpler. If a meaningful slice of the cost advantage was regulatory arbitrage, and that arbitrage has been withdrawn in the two largest markets within a year of each other, then the model must now win on merchandising and logistics alone, against Temu, Amazon Haul and every incumbent that spent five years learning from Shein.

There is also a question of shape. Holding stock closer to the customer, in European and American warehouses, would blunt the tariff hit but weaken the very thing that made the model work, namely tiny test batches, fast reorders and almost no inventory risk.

The competitive question is no longer who is cheapest but who can absorb a fixed cost per item and still look cheap.

The first real evidence arrives with second-quarter results. Watch three things. Whether US price increases stick without volume falling away.

Whether the loss narrows or deepens. And whether fulfilment and marketing costs finally grow slower than revenue.

Until then, a share price sitting below its offer is not the market being harsh. It is the market waiting.

It has removed any confidence that the shock is temporary. Every attempted de-escalation, including the June memorandum of understanding on reopening Hormuz, collapsed within weeks. Traders now treat energy inflation as structural rather than a passing spike.

Markets had read new Federal Reserve chair Kevin Warsh’s hawkish Jackson Hole remarks as the moment long-end yields would settle. Renewed fighting and dearer crude killed that idea within days.

Governments that cannot stop borrowing
The second force is fiscal, and Japan is the clearest case. Tokyo expects debt servicing costs to rise 17% to a record 36.64 trillion yen, about USD 230 billion, next fiscal year, on an assumed interest rate of 3.8%, the highest in 29 years.

Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi wants to cap new issuance at around 40 trillion yen for the fiscal 2027 budget, a promise aimed at reassuring investors ahead of a fourth straight year of record spending and a planned tax cut on food.

Britain has its own version. Andy Burnham became Prime Minister in July and installed John Healey at the Treasury, and gilt yields moved almost at once on his suggestion that he would seek flexibility within the fiscal rules. The autumn budget is now the event gilt investors are watching.

In the United States, federal interest payments now exceed combined spending on Medicaid, national defence and all non-defence discretionary programmes.

France carries a persistent risk premium over Germany tied to its budget process and the 2027 elections. Investors are asking a question they had not bothered with for fifteen years, which is who buys all this paper, and at what price.

The AI borrowing wave
The third force is new, and most investors underestimated it. The AI buildout has moved from an equity story to a fixed income story.

Alphabet, Amazon, Meta, Microsoft and Oracle issued roughly USD 121 billion of bonds in all of 2025, more than four times their 2020 to 2024 annual average. By early June 2026 the same five had raised about USD 159 billion.

Broader AI-related issuance, taking in data centres, chip financing and project vehicles, has reached roughly USD 500 billion this year, around 18% of total US investment grade supply, up from about 7% in 2025 and roughly 1% in 2024.

The paper is unusually long dated, because data centres are long-lived assets.

Alphabet has issued a century bond maturing in 2126, the first from a technology company since 1997, and technology firms account for around 60% of all deals above USD 10 billion this year.

S&P estimates the five will spend about USD 750 billion on capital expenditure in 2026, equal to 38% of their combined revenue.

The effect is mechanical. A huge quantity of high-grade duration is being pushed into the same part of the curve where governments must fund themselves, just as central banks shrink their own holdings.

Sovereign issuers are now competing directly with Big Tech for the same buyers, and they are not obviously winning. Of 91 hyperscaler bonds issued in 2026 with comparable pricing data, 78 were trading at higher yields in late July than when they were sold.

Tariffs, and the hole they left behind
Tariff warfare has fed the rout from both directions. Through 2025 and early 2026 the American effective tariff rate climbed to nearly 17%, the highest since the early 1930s, and New York Fed research found that close to 90% of the cost fell on American firms and consumers.

That was imported inflation, and it hardened the price expectations now embedded in long yields.

Then, on February 20 2026, the Supreme Court ruled that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act does not authorise the president to impose tariffs, striking down the reciprocal duties.

The administration pivoted to Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974 and to existing Section 232 and 301 powers, and the average effective rate fell to about 7.1% by June. But the ruling erased a large expected revenue stream and opened the door to refunds estimated at up to USD 175 billion.

A government that loses tariff income without cutting spending borrows the difference, and the bond market has priced exactly that.

Where equities feel it
Global equity indices have absorbed the move so far, but cracks are visible underneath.

The MSCI All Country World Index remains near a record, while the technology-heavy Nasdaq Composite is down almost 4% from its June high. The damage is showing up sector by sector rather than in the headline number.

Long-duration growth stocks are the most exposed, because a higher discount rate compresses the value of profits expected years out. That hits the same technology names now issuing the debt, creating a loop in which the AI trade raises the cost of the capital it depends on.

Utilities and real estate, the classic bond proxies, suffer directly. Investors who held them for income can now get a comparable return from government paper without taking equity risk.

Banks and insurers are the relative winners, because lenders earn a wider spread as the curve steepens and insurers earn more on the fixed income portfolios they must hold. Energy has been among the strongest performing sectors of 2026, for the obvious reason that the thing driving inflation is also driving its revenue.

Housing and consumer discretionary sit at the sharp end. Mortgage rates track the 10-year Treasury plus a risk premium and are at their highest since the summer of 2025, in economies where affordability is already the dominant political complaint. Traders widely regard 5% on the US 10-year as the point at which equity markets stop shrugging.

How governments are responding
On Augusts 19, the United States Treasury said it would at least double its long-dated buybacks, from USD 2 billion to at least USD 4 billion per operation, running from Seotember 9 to November 4, apart from targeting the 10 to 30-year sector, where a buyers’ strike had set in since late June. Yields fell, then erased the move within a day.

Secretary Scott Bessent has since called the figure a floor rather than a limit, and officials have signalled that the roughly USD 1 trillion Treasury General Account could fund larger operations.

Fitch expects the debt capital market to expand moderately through the rest of 2026 and in 2027, supported by funding diversification, financing requirements across sectors and regulatory reforms.

More than 70% of outstanding UAE debt was denominated in US dollars at the end of June, while sukuk accounted for 21% of the market.

The trend also reflects the UAE’s strategy of deepening capital markets and attracting international investors, while giving banks, companies and government-related entities flexibility over how they raise funds across market conditions over the medium term.

ALSO READ | With 84% share, Saudi Arabia emerges as Gulf’s top dividend market 

Fitch said UAE issuers had generally maintained access to bond and sukuk markets despite volatility created by the Iran war.

Some borrowers responded by using private placements and syndicated financing, while issuance in dirhams by non-government entities remained limited.

“UAE issuers have generally maintained market access so far in 2026 despite regional volatilities,” said Bashar Al-Natoor, Fitch’s global head of Islamic Finance.

He said market diversity had increased, pointing to the first dirham digitally native notes, sovereign retail sukuk, blue and green bonds and certificates of deposit.

Fitch said the near-term trajectory of issuance would depend partly on regional stability. Improved conditions could create a more favourable funding environment, while renewed escalation in the US-Iran conflict could weigh on market growth.

The debt capital market is also sensitive to changes in global interest rates and oil prices, which influence borrowing costs and investor demand.

Fitch expects consolidated UAE government debt to rise to 25% of GDP in 2026, from 22.7% in 2025. Banks and corporates are expected to continue issuing debt opportunistically.

Credit quality remains another support. Fitch reported that over 80% of UAE sukuk were investment grade, with no defaults recorded.

However, the proportion of issuers with stable outlooks declined to 81% during the first half, while Fitch placed Ras Al Khaimah and several corporate and sukuk issuers on Rating Watch Negative.

Liquidity in Fitch-rated UAE sukuk improved in August compared with March but remained below its pre-conflict level in January.

The UAE’s performance also sits within a wider expansion of Gulf debt markets. Kuwait Financial Centre, or Markaz, estimated that GCC bond and sukuk issuance reached USD 102.69 billion in the first half, up 6.5% from a year earlier.

Saudi Arabia remained the region’s largest issuer, while the UAE ranked second, raising USD 25.45 billion through 58 transactions.

Nasdaq Dubai also recorded 33 fixed-income listings worth USD 13.8 billion during the first six months. Total debt listed on the exchange reached USD 141 billion, including USD 98.6 billion of sukuk and USD 42.4 billion of bonds.

Fitch expects UAE issuers to remain among the largest emerging-market dollar debt issuers and among the world’s leading sukuk issuers and investors.

For borrowers, a deepening investor base and access to international capital provide alternatives to bank financing and domestic markets.

For investors, the UAE offers exposure to investment-grade sovereign-linked, banking and corporate credits in a market that continues to broaden its instruments.

The main challenge will be maintaining that access if geopolitical tensions intensify or global borrowing costs rise.

ALSO READ | Sukuk liquidity edges closer to pre-Iran war levels but recovery fragmented, says Fitch

For now, however, the surge in dollar issuance suggests that UAE borrowers continue to see international debt markets as a reliable source of capital, reinforcing the country’s position as one of the Gulf’s most important fixed-income centres.

ALSO READ | US debt tops USD 40 trillion, Trump again calls for lower interest rates

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has tried to address the immediate market pressure by expanding the department’s buyback program for longer-dated Treasuries. The plan is designed to improve liquidity and reduce the supply of older securities in the market, potentially supporting prices and lowering yields.

But the bond market’s response has been skeptical. The Treasury doubled planned purchases to USD 4 billion per operation, yet long-term yields rose again almost immediately. Analysts cited by AP said the intervention is small relative to the size of the Treasury market and cannot by itself resolve concerns about deficits, inflation, and the government’s borrowing requirements.

The rebound also shows why lower short-term policy rates do not automatically translate into cheaper long-term borrowing. Treasury yields reflect expectations for future interest rates, inflation, and economic growth, as well as the supply of government debt and demand from domestic and overseas investors.

The Federal Reserve is adding to that uncertainty. Minutes from its July meeting showed that many officials believed higher rates could be necessary if inflation remains elevated. The Fed kept its benchmark rate around 3.6%, but the debate has become more complicated as energy prices rise and inflation remains above the central bank’s 2% target.

A Reuters poll conducted earlier this month found that most economists expected the Fed to keep its policy rate at 3.50%-3.75% through the end of the year. That cautious outlook reflects a weakening labour market and softer consumer data, but inflation remains a constraint on any aggressive easing cycle.

ALSO READ | Trump’s war, tariffs squeeze American wallets

For bond investors, the result is an uncomfortable combination. The economy is strong enough to prevent rapid rate cuts, and inflation is high enough to complicate a sustained decline in yields. That leaves the market vulnerable to sharp moves whenever economic data or official comments change expectations.

The consequences extend far beyond government finance. The 10-year Treasury yield is a key benchmark for mortgages, corporate bonds and a wide range of financial assets. When it rises, companies face higher refinancing costs and consumers typically encounter more expensive loans. Businesses with large capital requirements, including technology companies building data centres for artificial intelligence, are particularly exposed.

The housing market is already feeling the pressure. Mortgage rates have remained around 6.6%, according to recent market data, limiting affordability even as the Federal Reserve’s policy rate is well below its peak from the previous tightening cycle.

Higher Treasury yields can also alter equity valuations. The return available from government bonds provides investors with an alternative to riskier assets, while higher discount rates reduce the present value of future corporate earnings. That is particularly relevant for growth and technology stocks, whose valuations depend heavily on profits expected years into the future.

There is also an international dimension. US Treasuries sit at the center of the global financial system, so higher yields can draw capital towards dollar assets while tightening financial conditions elsewhere. Governments and companies in emerging markets that borrow in dollars can face higher refinancing costs, while foreign central banks must weigh the impact of changing US yields on their currencies and bond markets.

Developments overseas are also reinforcing the recent rise in yields. Global bond markets have been under pressure as investors reassess inflation, government borrowing, and the relative attractiveness of sovereign debt. Rising yields in Japan and Europe have reduced some of the traditional advantage enjoyed by US government bonds.

ALSO READ |  US trade deficit narrows as imports fall, tariff impact still clouds outlook

Geopolitical risks are another factor. Higher oil prices linked to the conflict involving Iran have revived concerns about inflation. A renewed inflation shock would make it harder for the Federal Reserve to lower rates and could push investors to demand still higher yields on long-term Treasuries.

Markets are now watching Fed Chair Kevin Warsh for clearer guidance on the direction of monetary policy, particularly at the Jackson Hole symposium. Any indication that the central bank is prepared to tolerate higher inflation could put further upward pressure on long-term yields.

For the Treasury, the challenge is therefore larger than managing day-to-day volatility. Buybacks can improve market liquidity and influence the composition of outstanding debt, but they cannot eliminate the underlying supply of government borrowing.

Until investors become more confident that inflation is contained and Washington can stabilise its fiscal trajectory, attempts to push borrowing costs lower may continue to provide only temporary relief. The bond market is effectively demanding a more durable answer.

ALSO READ | Anthropic revenue surges ahead of IPO as company eyes Decart AI acquisition

Investor psychology could make the eventual adjustment more severe. Excessive optimism can push prices beyond what fundamentals justify, leaving markets vulnerable to a sharper decline when sentiment changes.

The ECB emphasised that predicting the timing of such a correction is impossible and that boom-bust patterns are typically identifiable only in hindsight. and that boom-bust patterns are generally identifiable only in hindsight.

The potential fallout extends well beyond Wall Street. Euro-area households have about 440 billion euros of exposure to US technology equities, much of it through mutual funds and exchange-traded funds rather than direct holdings. Insurance companies and pension funds also have substantial exposure to the Magnificent Seven.

That fund-based exposure could amplify a sell-off. If investors rush to redeem holdings during a sharp correction, funds may first sell liquid assets and eventually distressed holdings, putting further pressure on valuations and potentially triggering another wave of redemptions.

The ECB therefore regards a major decline in Magnificent Seven shares as a potential financial stability issue rather than simply an investment loss.

The risks are becoming more significant as the financing of the AI boom grows increasingly complex. Nvidia recently announced partnerships with Apollo Global Management, BlackRock, Blackstone, Brookfield, Goldman Sachs and KKR aimed at mobilising more than USD 500 billion to finance AI infrastructure.

The initiative is intended to help AI laboratories and emerging cloud providers fund expensive data centre equipment, with Nvidia potentially guaranteeing part of the collateral.

Meanwhile, major technology companies are committing enormous sums to AI infrastructure. Alphabet, Amazon, Meta, Microsoft and Oracle are expected to spend about USD 750 billion on data centres in 2026, according to S&P Global Ratings estimates cited by Reuters. The scale of spending has intensified questions over whether future AI revenues will justify the capital being deployed.

Yet there is evidence supporting the bullish case. Investors remain focused on robust cloud growth and persistent demand for AI computing capacity, while Microsoft and Amazon have reported strong results that have eased some concerns over the profitability of AI infrastructure spending.

Major investors are increasingly trying to identify which companies will capture durable profits from the AI ecosystem rather than simply questioning the overall investment cycle.

The ECB also sees less immediate risk of a home-grown technology crash in Europe. Euro-area price-to-earnings ratios remain considerably below US levels, while European stock markets contain a larger share of traditional industries. Digital investment and AI adoption are nevertheless increasing across the region.

That relative caution offers limited protection because European and US equity markets have historically been closely correlated.

A Wall Street correction could therefore hit European share prices, weaken investor sentiment, tighten financing conditions and affect corporate hiring even without a comparable European technology bubble.

ALSO READ | Wall Street bets USD 500 billion on Nvidia’s AI boom as Big Tech faces debt concerns

The ECB’s bigger concern is what happens if an equity correction coincides with broader financial instability. Unlike during the dot-com collapse, policymakers now have less room to cut interest rates or deploy fiscal policy to cushion a major shock.

The message is that AI is succeeding, but technological success does not guarantee permanently rising asset prices. For investors and policymakers, the challenge is preparing for a repricing of AI expectations without mistaking genuine technological transformation for a guarantee of ever-higher valuations.