<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Archives - International Finance</title>
	<atom:link href="https://internationalfinance.com/tag/industrial-and-commercial-bank-of-china/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://internationalfinance.com/tag/industrial-and-commercial-bank-of-china/</link>
	<description>International Finance - Financial News, Magazine and Awards</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Oct 2019 11:42:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-GB</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.9</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>China’s ICBC lists two bonds worth $1 bn on Nasdaq Dubai</title>
		<link>https://internationalfinance.com/banking/chinas-icbc-lists-two-bonds-worth-1-bn-nasdaq-dubai/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=chinas-icbc-lists-two-bonds-worth-1-bn-nasdaq-dubai</link>
					<comments>https://internationalfinance.com/banking/chinas-icbc-lists-two-bonds-worth-1-bn-nasdaq-dubai/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[International Finance Desk]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Oct 2019 11:42:36 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Banking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[banking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bonds issuance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chinese bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dp World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dubai exchange]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industrial and Commercial Bank of China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Islamic Bonds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nasdaq Dubai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sukuk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Warba Bank]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://internationalfinance.com/?p=28142</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Each bond is worth $500 million—and reflect the financial and economic relationship between Dubai and China</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://internationalfinance.com/banking/chinas-icbc-lists-two-bonds-worth-1-bn-nasdaq-dubai/">China’s ICBC lists two bonds worth $1 bn on Nasdaq Dubai</a> appeared first on <a href="https://internationalfinance.com">International Finance</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (ICBC) listed two bonds with a total worth of $1 billion on Nasdaq Dubai. Each bond is worth $500 million. The bonds listed on the exchange are the highest value of conventional bonds by a foreign issuer. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">According to local media reports, the total value of bonds listed on Nasdaq Dubai by the ICBC reaches $4.56 billion from nine issuances. All the bonds were issued by the Chinese bank’s branch in Dubai. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The two bonds were listed on October 17, 2019. The listings reflect the financial and economic relationship between Dubai and China. China is the UAE’s largest non-oil trading partner. </span><span style="font-weight: 400;">Nasdaq Dubai is the international financial exchange in the Middle East. ICBC is the world’s largest bank by assets. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Earlier this month, DP World listed a </span><span style="font-weight: 400;">$500 million sukuk and a $500 million conventional bond on Nasdaq Dubai. DP World is a global port operator formed by Dubai Ports Authority and Dubai Ports International. It is also the UAE’s largest debt issuer by value with sukuk and conventional bond listings totalling $9.09 billion, the media reported. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Another bank that listed sukuk on Nasdaq Dubai is Kuwait’s Warba Bank. The Kuwaiti lender listed $500 million sukuk on the exchange this month. It is the second Islamic bond to be listed by the lender, after the listing of a $250 million instrument in March.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Shaheen Al-Ghanem, Chief Executive of Warba Bank, told the media that, “The Sukuk attracted investors from the GCC, the wider MENA region and beyond, underlining the confidence of the market in Warba Bank’s dynamic expansion strategy in business sectors including investment, corporate and retail banking.”</span></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://internationalfinance.com/banking/chinas-icbc-lists-two-bonds-worth-1-bn-nasdaq-dubai/">China’s ICBC lists two bonds worth $1 bn on Nasdaq Dubai</a> appeared first on <a href="https://internationalfinance.com">International Finance</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://internationalfinance.com/banking/chinas-icbc-lists-two-bonds-worth-1-bn-nasdaq-dubai/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Morgan Stanley, Barclays, HSBC pose reduced risk to global financial stability</title>
		<link>https://internationalfinance.com/banking/morgan-stanley-barclays-hsbc-pose-reduced-risk-to-global-financial-stability/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=morgan-stanley-barclays-hsbc-pose-reduced-risk-to-global-financial-stability</link>
					<comments>https://internationalfinance.com/banking/morgan-stanley-barclays-hsbc-pose-reduced-risk-to-global-financial-stability/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[International Finance Desk]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2016 07:27:19 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Banking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank of America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[banks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barclays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Basel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citigroup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dodd Frank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donald Trump]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Stability Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FSB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HSBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[important]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industrial and Commercial Bank of China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Morgan Stanley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Switzerland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[systemically]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wells Fargo]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://142.4.4.69/beta/?p=4502</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Financial Stability Board releases list of global systemically important banks</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://internationalfinance.com/banking/morgan-stanley-barclays-hsbc-pose-reduced-risk-to-global-financial-stability/">Morgan Stanley, Barclays, HSBC pose reduced risk to global financial stability</a> appeared first on <a href="https://internationalfinance.com">International Finance</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Citigroup, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and also the Industrial and Commercial Bank of China, have ranked higher in the latest list of global systemically important banks released by the Financial Stability Board (FSB). The board is a group of central bankers and financial regulators from some of the world’s largest economies which functions out of Switzerland.</p>
<p>Such a change in ranking would lead to additional capital requirements for the banks in question as an insurance against failure and the subsequent ripple effects through the global economy. But, in this case, a Citigroup spokesperson commented that they are already subject to high capital requirements laid down by the Federal Reserve: “The GSIB measure announced this morning by the FSB does not have an impact on any of Citi’s binding regulatory metrics.”</p>
<p><strong>Capital buffer<br />
</strong>The Basel-based FSB will, from January 2018, require Citigroup Inc. to hold a 2.5 percent capital buffer in comparison to the 2 percent called for in the previous year while Bank of America is now required to keep 2 percent compared to last year’s 1.5 percent. Wells Fargo’s capital buffer level went up to 1.5 percent from 1 percent, which was the level required last year.</p>
<p>Morgan Stanley, Barclays and HSBC lie on the other side of the spectrum in this regard, having been adjudged to be less risky to global financial stability as compared to last year. These banks have managed to better their position largely by selling off part of their riskier businesses or reducing the size of some of them.</p>
<p>The case of Deutsche Bank too is of note as the entity had been named the greatest systemic risk to international financial stability last year. With a capital requirement of 2 percent, it remains in its middle-tier position.</p>
<p><strong>The basis of FSB’s decision<br />
</strong>The board’s decision was based on ‘data quality improvements, changes in underlying activity and the use of supervisory judgment’, going by a press release. According to the Financial Times, ‘people familiar with the move’ said the decision came on the back of a surge in the value of the US dollar, which then resulted in a heightening of American banks’ risk profile.</p>
<p><strong>The T<img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-4493" src="https://142.4.4.69/beta/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/donald-trump-300x183.jpg" alt="donald-trump" width="300" height="183" srcset="https://internationalfinance.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/donald-trump-300x183.jpg 300w, https://internationalfinance.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/donald-trump-656x400.jpg 656w, https://internationalfinance.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/donald-trump-585x357.jpg 585w, https://internationalfinance.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/donald-trump.jpg 666w" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" />rump effect<br />
</strong>It is also of note that the higher risk rankings came shortly after Donald’s Trump’s election victory. Trump has promised several times to do away with Dodd-Frank, a law that seeks to mitigate the systemic risks – those that set off the 2008 financial crisis – posed by America’s large banks.</p>
<p>A note on Trump’s website reads: &#8220;The Dodd-Frank economy does not work for working people. Bureaucratic red tape and Washington mandates are not the answer. The Financial Services Policy Implementation team will be working to dismantle the Dodd-Frank Act and replace it with new policies to encourage economic growth and job creation.&#8221;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://internationalfinance.com/banking/morgan-stanley-barclays-hsbc-pose-reduced-risk-to-global-financial-stability/">Morgan Stanley, Barclays, HSBC pose reduced risk to global financial stability</a> appeared first on <a href="https://internationalfinance.com">International Finance</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://internationalfinance.com/banking/morgan-stanley-barclays-hsbc-pose-reduced-risk-to-global-financial-stability/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
