Launched in 2022, ‘Buy with Prime’ has been available to certain merchants that have been using ‘Fulfillment by Amazon’ (FBA), and a select handful via an invite-only scheme. From February 2023, more online stores will be able to benefit from Amazon Prime.

US-based vendors will be able to pull reviews that customers have submitted to the Amazon platform straight onto their site, thus allowing these businesses to tap into a huge potential for more reviews. The third-party vendor customers can expect free, fast delivery from Prime.

“We’ve been working closely with merchants since the launch of Buy with Prime and have been thrilled to hear the results it’s helped drive for them so far,” noted Peter Larsen, VP for Buy with Prime, while interacting with Techradar.com.

There is an average increased shopper conversion rate of 25%, which Amazon bases on shops that does/does not have ‘Buy with Prime’ set up, measured during the same time period to avoid misconstrued figures as a result of seasonality and external factors.

Smart home tech company Wyze has reportedly seen a 25% boost in shopper conversions, leading it to offer ‘Buy with Prime’ on its entire catalogue of products. The setup offers the company’s own online cart experience, or the Prime offering which requires customers to log in with their Amazon account. Electrolyte drink mix brand Hydralyte experienced a similarly healthy boost of 14%, while skincare brand Trophy Skin saw an improvement of over 30%.

“We launched Buy with Prime as an invite-only offering and are excited to soon make it widely available to merchants of all sizes based in the U.S. We’re eager to gather feedback from merchants to help us build and improve this offering over time,” told an Amazon official to Techradar on the development.

Photo Credit: Amazon

The post ‘Buy with Prime’: Amazon’s latest weapon to dominate US e-commerce sector appeared first on International Finance.

Nigel Green

Investors need to prepare now for three key issues ahead of Britain formally starting divorce proceedings with the EU. UK Prime Minister Theresa May is expected to trigger Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty on March 29.

By this time next week, Britain will have officially started the process of unravelling itself from the European Union. This is one of the most complex negotiations in political history with global consequences, and as with most divorce proceedings, it is unlikely to be completely smooth sailing. As such, investors need to ensure their portfolios are ‘Brexit-proofed’.

With the clock ticking on the starting pistol being fired, investors need to prepare now for three key issues.

First, be prepared for increased market volatility.  Uncertainty creates tidal waves of volatility across financial markets – and the Brexit negotiations represent a huge unknown.

Against a backdrop of growing volatility, investors need to ensure that their portfolios are truly diversified. This means investing across geographical regions, sectors and asset classes. Those with a well-diversified portfolio are always best-placed to mitigate risk in times of market turbulence, and best-placed to take advantage of the opportunities.

UK assets are likely to feel the heat. Investors should consider taking precautions against the potentially significant adverse effects of Brexit on UK assets, which they can do by increasing exposure to overseas investments.

Second, be prepared for sterling to experience further swings.  The pound fell 10 per cent against the dollar in the week after the referendum to leave the EU. Similarly, it dipped this week when Theresa May confirmed the trigger date of Article 50.

Sterling is currently considered cheap, considering the underlying buoyance of the British economy, now forecast to grow 2 per cent in 2017. This is a buying opportunity for some investors.  However, with an enormous question mark hanging over the negotiations, and the creeping inflation, the pound’s current low value might not last.

And third, be prepared for the far-reaching impact of higher UK inflation and higher interest rates. This week, inflation hit its highest level in more than three years – and smashed the Bank of England’s official target.  This has raised expectations that interest rates could be hiked sooner rather than later.

This new landscape will present a new set of winners and losers for investors. A good financial adviser will help them select the right investments and, crucially, at the right time.

A lot has happened since the EU referendum in June 2016, and today the economy is facing a very different set of issues.  The economic landscape will continue to shift significantly during the two-year negotiation period.  Investors need to remain aware and agile and ensure their portfolios are Brexit-proofed.

Nigel Green is founder and CEO of deVere Group

RELATED STORIES

‘Dutch election result hint at more constructive approach to policy’

May likely to deny Scottish independence referendum

Merger of LSE & Deutsche Boerse in doubt

The post Article 50 countdown: Investors need to prepare for 3 key issues appeared first on International Finance.

What is your take on the electoral result in the Netherlands?

After the annus horribilis in which several elections resulted in unexpected outcomes (admittedly without the much feared negative impact on asset prices), this time we have had a result that is in line with recent polls and will not lead to a tremendous change in the policy and political approach of the country involved. That said, a negative aspect is the fragmentation across parties of the result (also expected), which will likely be a source of instability and difficulty for the government.

It remains to be seen how the incumbent premier, Mark Rutte, will try to form a new government. It seems clear that any coalition will involve at least four parties, ranging from the center-to-right to the left of the political landscape (generally, ‘Pro-Euro’); during the campaign, he repeatedly ruled out any possibility of repeating a coalition with Geert Wilder and his anti-immigration Freedom Party.

Do you think this could influence the outcome of elections in France?

Success breeds success: this was apparent last year with the rise of the ‘populistic’ movements across the globe.  This result could, therefore, suggest that a peak in the appeal of these ideas is behind us and that a more constructive approach to policy and politics and, above all, to Europe is gaining momentum. So, yes, in our view, it could have a positive influence on the French vote.

What is your assessment of the risk of a Euro break-up and how has it changed over the last few months?

A break-up of the Euro is, economically speaking, an unacceptable event. European Central Bank President Mario Draghi abruptly clarified this concept when he stated the fact that any country exiting the Euro would need to clear its Target2 balances first (which for Italy amounts to around €390 billion).

But what if Euro-sceptic forces start taking the lead in a number of countries? We think a useful analogy here is to imagine the Eurozone and Europe are a cyclist that is going uphill. They cannot stop pedaling until they reach the top of the hill (i.e., when everything is in order, and clearly we are not there yet) otherwise they will start to go backwards and will, eventually, fall down in a heap. This may appear a bit extreme: on some issues, the progresses and benefits of the currency and Union are clear; but there are other mechanisms, particularly in the field of sharing risks, solidarity and common policies, that still have to be resolved. And these have been put under severe pressure given the scale of the recent crisis. The cyclist must arrive at the top of the hill and commence the downhill journey before the next crisis arrives. Yet, if Euro-sceptic forces gain appeal and power in the Eurozone and Europe, we see an increased likelihood that our cyclist stops pedaling.

Last year, starting with Brexit, the probability of a ruinous standstill in Europe rose materially, although it is still considered a tail event. Higher spreads between OATs (the 10 year French government bond) and BUNDs (the 10 year German government bond) are the market’s assessment of that probability (which does not including credit risk or sovereign default risk). Meanwhile, the issue of a Euro exit, or adoption of a different currency, is a recurrent theme – most recently in the electoral positioning of political parties in Italy – is another perilous sign.

The Dutch electoral result has enabled this risk to recede a little, but there are a number of political issues ahead: elections in France, Brexit with the complication of a second Scottish independence referendum, the still unresolved Greek question, and possible political instability in Italy to name a few.

How can investors deal with geopolitical risk within a multi-asset approach?

Geopolitical risk remains, in our view, the main factor for investors to watch over the next few months. Financial markets are too complacent ahead of the wave of elections in Europe: equity volatility is reaching new lows even though the probability of a country leaving the Euro, as highlighted by the Sentix Euro Break-Up Index, is trending towards post Brexit levels.

If we also consider the uncertainties related to the execution of Trump’s policies in the US, and of his potentially unfriendly foreign policy for some Emerging Markets, we see significant risks of disappointment for financial markets. This also considering extended valuations in many developed equity and credit markets.

Therefore, we believe investors should consider implement hedging in an effort to partially offset the negative effects of geopolitical risk. There are multiple strategies available for investors: lowly correlated assets, such as gold; currencies that tend to behave as ‘safe havens’, such as the Swiss Franc, and, especially in case of rising risks in the Eurozone, the US dollar; or the use of derivatives to try to protect risk asset exposure. A multi-asset approach, which includes hedging among its investment strategies, can be beneficial in a period of rising geopolitical risk. It can efficiently combine the most effective hedging techniques, determining cost-efficient strategies for those risk events deemed most likely and impactful.

The post ‘Dutch election result hint at more constructive approach to policy’ appeared first on International Finance.

If it gets parliamentary approval, this will be the second Scottish independence referendum after 2014, when the region had voted to remain a part of the UK.

“I will take the steps necessary now to make sure that Scotland will have a choice at the end of this process. A choice of whether to follow the UK to a hard Brexit, or to become an independent country able to secure a real partnership of equals with the rest of the UK and our own relationship with Europe,” Sturgeon said.

Polls since the Brexit vote have shown that support for Scottish independence has been relatively unchanged since the first referendum in 2014.

UK Prime Minister Theresa May is expected to deny permission for another referendum. May was quick to react to Sturgeon’s announcement, hitting back at her claim that the government had put up a ‘brick wall’ over Brexit arrangements.

“We’ve been working closely with the devolved administrations,” said the PM. “We’ve been listening to their proposals and recognising the many areas of common ground we have, such as protecting workers’ rights and our security from crime and terrorism. The tunnel vision that the SNP has shown is deeply regrettable. It sets Scotland on a course for more uncertainty and division. This is at a time when the evidence is that the majority of the Scottish people do not want a second independence referendum.”

The post May likely to deny Scottish independence referendum appeared first on International Finance.

February 13, 2017: The concept of macroeconomics can be complicated enough, without attempting to correlate the real-time relationship that exists between entities such as inflation, interests and the value of the pound. This correlation is particularly difficult to trace at present, thanks primarily to the lingering spectre of Brexit and the impact that is having on every aspect of the British economy.

Let’s start with the value of the pound, however, which has experienced mixed fortunes since the June referendum vote. Although it sunk to a record low in the hours after the result was announced, it rebounded steadily during the third financial quarter. Then it plummeted to a new, 31-year low after a Theresa May-led conference in October, during which she revealed the likelihood of a hard Brexit and her initial intention to trigger Article 50 in March of 2017.

Inflation, the pound and the rising cost of imports

As if this was not enough, the pound experienced a further dip after disappointing UK inflation data, which emerged despite the overall rate declining from 1% to 0.9%. Although this surprised experts who had predicted a slight rise in inflation, the overall rate continues to outstrip the base interest rate being maintained by the Bank of England (BoE). This is beginning to have a huge impact on savings accounts rates and households nationwide, while the Office for National Statistics (ONS) also relayed that factory gate prices and the cost of raw materials also increased at a disproportionate rate throughout October.

As we can see, this is continuing a destructive macroeconomic cycle, as a perpetually weak pound continues to trigger inflation hikes while creating a need to maintain base interest rates.

This trend is likely to continue for the foreseeable future, at least until there is greater clarity concerning the terms of Brexit and the UK’s economic strategy in the meantime. The fact that raw material costs are also rising sharply offers an indication as to how a weak pound is beginning to increase the cost of imports, which will translate into higher consumer inflation over time. According to recent PPI data, the cost of procuring materials jumped by a record margin in October, increasing by 4.6% over a four-week period.

Similarly, price of goods leaving factories has already risen by its highest margin since April 2012 (2.1%), meaning that customers are beginning and will continue to shoulder the burden of a weak pound and soaring, disproportionate inflation levels. This is particularly concerning, as our economy currently remains over-reliant on consumer spending and borrowing, meaning that a sustained period of currency volatility and high inflation could have one of two significant consequences; either consumers will borrow more and create an increased debt burden, or simply stop spending and save their money. Both these options are potentially harmful to the economy, meaning that the threat of a recession will continue to loom as we enter 2017.

Are there reasons for optimism?

At this point, it is important to note that there are reasons for optimism in the UK. Firstly, developed economies and the financial markets have become increasingly robust since the Great Recession, while economists, investors and political leaders have applied determinism to minimise the impact of volatility. This is likely to be the case here, with the Federal Reserve in the US and the UK’s own BoE considering hiking interest rates as a way of negating some of the havoc wreaked by rising inflation (this will be good news for savers in particular). Additionally, although growth slowed according to the recent GDP results, there was some growth to speak of.

The pound itself also received a boost when Donald Trump was announced as the President-elect in the United States, as this triggered a wave of volatility with the global markers and triggered a decline in the value of the dollar. This led to gains for the GBP/USD, although many of these were lost at the beginning of the week. Given that little is known about Trump’s precise economic policies (and the fact that the real estate mogul is known to favour a slightly weakened dollar), the pound may be able to make further gains during the next financial quarter, make sure to keep an eye on currency trading rates.

The last word

Ultimately, much will depend on the BoE and how it intends to restructure and rebalance the macro economy. This will almost certainly mean a rise in interest rates, as this will at least partially minimise the impact of rampant inflation.

It can do little about the value or the volatility of the pound, however, which remains the main trigger of inflation and rising import costs. Resolving this issue sits on the shoulders of the government, who must act decisively when dealing with Brexit and strive to lay out a clear path of growth going forward.

Marcus Turner Jones is an investor based in Buenos Aires

The post UK troubled by inflation and weak pound appeared first on International Finance.

Eng. Mohammed Ahmed bin Abdul Aziz Al Shehhi, the UAE Ministry of Economy’s Undersecretary for Economic Affairs, and Husnu Dilemre, the Acting Deputy Undersecretary of Turkey’s Ministry of Economy, will lead the technical and preparatory meeting prior to the JEC ministerial meeting in the presence of Khalifa Shaheen Al Marar, UAE Ambassador to the Republic of Turkey, along with a number of senior officials and government representatives of both countries.

The meeting’s agenda will include a discussion on forming cooperative agreements in a number of important areas, particularly the expansion of bilateral trade and the creation of a cooperative model for knowledge exchange in the areas of innovation and small and medium enterprises (SMEs). The session also seeks to highlight investment opportunities in the tourism, hospitality, food, transportation, renewable energy, health, and financial services sectors. It will discuss ways to enhance cooperation in the field of civil aviation as well.

H.E. Al Mansoori, UAE Minister of Economy, said that growth opportunities for UAE-Turkey relations have not been fully explored, adding that the resumption of the JEC between the two countries is a positive step towards advancing the level of economic and trade relations between the two countries.

He noted that innovation, SMEs and entrepreneurship are areas that hold many opportunities for cooperation and the exchange of expertise as well as the establishment of partnerships at both the government and private sector levels. He added that the UAE is highly interested in further developing areas of cooperation and creating new investment opportunities in civil aviation as the sector has a direct impact on trade and tourism flows.

The UAE minister highlighted the many achievements of the Turkish economy and its outstanding international reputation in the industrial sector, which he referred to as an important gateway to expand cooperation between the two countries through the exchange of knowledge and expertise in line with the UAE’s vision of establishing a highly advanced industrial base that adds value to the national economy.

He also emphasised the Turkish market’s importance for UAE products and exports, as well as Turkey being an access route to several European and Asian markets, similar to how the UAE provides a strategic link between the East and the West. He said that this presents promising possibilities for their joint economic and trade relations to expand to broader markets in the future.

The trade volume between the UAE and Turkey has dramatically increased in recent years, with bilateral non-oil foreign trade inclusive of free zone activities reaching $7.4 billion by the end of 2015. Turkey was the UAE’s 15th biggest global trade partner, sixth largest importer and 13th top exporter for the same year.

The post UAE delegation in Turkey appeared first on International Finance.

Nigel Green

January 19, 2017: Theresa May’s Brexit speech and strong inflation data should prompt investors to reduce exposure to UK assets and invest more internationally.

After months of keeping her cards close to her chest, in her most important speech since becoming Prime Minister in July, Mrs May told the world that her plans for Brexit cannot allow the UK to remain in the European single market.

Although this stance has been widely expected by the markets, it is likely that this confirmation of a hard Brexit will trigger several years of ongoing uncertainty.

The markets detest uncertainty. As such, investors should take precautions against a potential fall in the value of UK assets and avoid firms dependent upon UK-only earnings.

Investors can achieve this by increasing exposure to non-UK investments, such as international stocks, bonds and property.

Stronger-than-expected inflation data – UK inflation has hit its highest level since the middle of 2014 – also adds weight to the argument to reduce portfolio exposure to UK assets as the Bank of England could be more inclined to now hike interest rates.

Regardless of the hard Brexit and the increasing likelihood of a rate rise, many investors should be considering a rebalance of their portfolios away from the UK.  Investing across geographical regions is one of the fundamentals of a well-diversified portfolio – and those with a well-diversified portfolio are best-placed to mitigate risk in times of market turbulence and best-placed to take advantage of the opportunities.

The greater diversification that is secured by ‘going more global’, the greater the reduction of overall portfolio risk.

Nigel Green is the founder and CEO of deVere Group

The post Now is the time to ‘go more global’ appeared first on International Finance.

Days after a December 5 eurozone agreement to approve some debt relief, Tsipras announced a Christmas bonus for some 1.6 million low-income pensioners and committed to restore a lower sales tax rate for Aegean Sea islanders. The move surprised the eurozone creditors, who suspended the debt relief.

Tsipras said at an EU summit that there is room for ‘a breakthrough, without blackmail’. He will be making his case on his country’s debt problems when he calls on German Chancellor Angela Merkel in Berlin.

He expressed confidence the dispute with European bailout lenders will be resolved soon.

“I, as you can see, am extremely calm, and think it is something that will be overcome very soon. The (Christmas bonus) does not in any way threaten the bailout program and the targets for the 2016 budget surplus,” Tsipras said, adding that bailout creditors are preparing a report on the issue.

He said Germany is the only European country to question the bonus.

“It is unacceptable for some to try to revive a negotiating game to the detriment of Greece and its people, which has made huge sacrifices in the name of Europe,” Tsipras said. “This is not reasonable.”

He also accused the IMF of pressing Greece to adopt new austerity measures after the end of the program. “No democratic parliament … could accept such a demand and decide on measures to be implemented, if needed, after three years,” he said.

EU Parliament President Martin Schulz, another socialist, came to Tsipras’ defense, although he acknowledged that strictly speaking, the Greek government’s decisions have not complied with what was agreed to.

The post Tsipras confident of winning dispute with European creditors appeared first on International Finance.

On December 4, large number of Italians turned up to vote in the constitutional referendum. Renzi won a little over 40 percent of the vote, a far worse result than polls had predicted. It ended months of campaigning for a reform that he said would have brought political stability to Italy but that opponents said jeopardised democratic checks and balances.

Shortly after the electoral results, Renzi announced his resignation and said that his ‘experience of government finishes here’ after the No campaign won what he described as an ‘extraordinarily clear’ victory in the referendum on which he had staked his future.

Following the referendum there seems to be uncertainty surrounding Italy’s financial future. The euro immediately fell against the dollar on the exit polls.

The post Italy votes ‘NO’ in referendum appeared first on International Finance.

December 5, 2016: The concept of macroeconomics can be complicated enough, without attempting to correlate the real-time relationship that exists between entities such as inflation, interests and the value of the pound. This correlation is particularly difficult to trace at present, thanks primarily to the lingering spectre of Brexit and the impact that is having on every aspect of the British economy.Let’s start with the value of the pound, however, which has experienced mixed fortunes since the June referendum vote. Although it sunk to a record low in the hours after the result was announced, it rebounded steadily during the third financial quarter. Then it plummeted to a new, 31-year low after a Theresa May-led conference in October, during which she revealed the likelihood of a hard Brexit and her initial intention to trigger Article 50 in March of 2017.

Inflation, the pound and the rising cost of imports

As if this was not enough, the pound experienced a further dip last week after disappointing UK inflation data, which emerged despite the overall rate declining from 1% to 0.9%. Although this surprised experts who had predicted a slight rise in inflation, the overall rate continues to outstrip the base interest rate being maintained by the Bank of England (BoE). This is beginning to have a huge impact on savings accounts rates and households nationwide, while the Office for National Statistics (ONS) also relayed that factory gate prices and the cost of raw materials also increased at a disproportionate rate throughout October.

As we can see, this is continuing a destructive macroeconomic cycle, as a perpetually weak pound continues to trigger inflation hikes while creating a need to maintain base interest rates.

This trend is likely to continue for the foreseeable future, at least until there is greater clarity concerning the terms of Brexit and the UK’s economic strategy in the meantime. The fact that raw material costs are also rising sharply offers an indication as to how a weak pound is beginning to increase the cost of imports, which will translate into higher consumer inflation over time. According to recent PPI data, the cost of procuring materials jumped by a record margin in October, increasing by 4.6% over a four-week period.

Similarly, price of goods leaving factories has already risen by its highest margin since April 2012 (2.1%), meaning that customers are beginning and will continue to shoulder the burden of a weak pound and soaring, disproportionate inflation levels. This is particularly concerning, as our economy currently remains over-reliant on consumer spending and borrowing, meaning that a sustained period of currency volatility and high inflation could have one of two significant consequences; either consumers will borrow more and create an increased debt burden, or simply stop spending and save their money. Both these options are potentially harmful to the economy, meaning that the threat of a recession will continue to loom as we enter 2017.

Are there reasons for optimism?

At this point, it is important to note that there are reasons for optimism in the UK. Firstly, developed economies and the financial markets have become increasingly robust since the Great Recession, while economists, investors and political leaders have applied determinism to minimise the impact of volatility. This is likely to be the case here, with the Federal Reserve in the US and the UK’s own BoE considering hiking interest rates as a way of negating some of the havoc wreaked by rising inflation (this will be good news for savers in particular). Additionally, although growth slowed according to the recent GDP results, there was some growth to speak of.

The pound itself also received a boost when Donald Trump was announced as the President-elect in the United States, as this triggered a wave of volatility with the global markers and triggered a decline in the value of the dollar. This led to gains for the GBP/USD, although many of these were lost at the beginning of the week. Given that little is known about Trump’s precise economic policies (and the fact that the real estate mogul is known to favour a slightly weakened dollar), the pound may be able to make further gains during the next financial quarter, make sure to keep an eye on currency trading rates.

The last word

Ultimately, much will depend on the BoE and how it intends to restructure and rebalance the macro economy. This will almost certainly mean a rise in interest rates, as this will at least partially minimise the impact of rampant inflation.

It can do little about the value or the volatility of the pound, however, which remains the main trigger of inflation and rising import costs. Resolving this issue sits on the shoulders of the government, who must act decisively when dealing with Brexit and strive to lay out a clear path of growth going forward.

Marcus Turner Jones is an investor based in Buenos Aires

The post UK troubled by inflation and weak pound appeared first on International Finance.