The scale of the exercise is worth noting. More than 5,800 companies across 43 countries and 20 industries were assessed, with 750 selected worldwide. The selection began with a shortlist of over 5,000 of the world’s largest and most influential firms, chosen for their revenue, market capitalisation and public prominence, before a four step process narrowed the field. Companies tied to fossil fuels, deforestation or major environmental scandals were automatically ruled out at the first stage, before the rest were scored against more than 20 sustainability indicators.

Topping the list this year is Schneider Electric, the French energy management giant. This is no one-off. The company has held the number one spot for three years running, in 2024, 2025 and now 2026, a run that analysts put down to the growing demand for decarbonisation technology.

How companies reacted
For firms that made the cut, the recognition has become something to shout about. Japan’s Ricoh, which has now appeared on the list for three consecutive years, had its sustainability chief call it a reflection of the firm’s push to embed transparency and accountability into daily operations.

Canada’s CAE described the listing as a considerable honour tied to its climate transition work, while Michigan based BorgWarner’s chief executive linked the recognition directly to long term growth, arguing that sustainability and business strength go hand in hand. Finland’s Elisa, ranked just behind fellow Finnish firm Nokia, called its own three year streak on the list proof of steady, long term work rather than a quick fix.

The broader picture
The context behind this year’s list is more complicated than the celebratory press releases suggest. Sustainability chiefs have had a difficult year, with many companies shifting focus towards cost savings, the US government withdrawing renewable energy tax credits and rolling back environmental rules, and an energy crisis stemming from the war in Iran threatening to push up prices across the board. Despite this, experts argue that most companies are staying the course. Maria Mendiluce, head of the We Mean Business Coalition, says pragmatism is taking hold among both companies and regulators, with Europe and Asia continuing to back green policy even as the politics get noisier.

One driver of this staying power is regulation. The European Union’s Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism, a tariff on carbon heavy imports that took effect at the start of 2026, has pushed more companies to pay closer attention to disclosure data so they can gauge how the tax will hit their bottom line. Similarly, the EU’s 2025 rule requiring a minimum share of sustainable aviation fuel at European airports has made operators like ninth placed Aena more active in encouraging its uptake.

Oxford researcher Kaya Axelsson sums up where this is heading. She argues that the next phase of corporate climate action will be less about setting individual targets and more about changing the systems companies operate within, even as economics make the case for a green transition clearer than the politics.

For everyday readers, the takeaway is simple. Sustainability is no longer a side project chasing good headlines. It is increasingly being tracked, measured and, as this list shows, rewarded.

The post TIME and Statista name world’s most sustainable companies for 2026 appeared first on International Finance.

IFM Correspondent

January 31, 2016: Consumers around the world are increasingly using mobile phones to make online payments. This is helped by the increase in the number of people using smartphones.

According to Statista, the overall number of mobile phone users reached 4.43 billion in 2015. This number was expected to grow to 4.61 billion in 2016 and 4.77 billion in 2017.

The most commonly used form of cashless payment is the digital wallet. A digital wallet is an electronic device that allows individuals to make electronic transactions.

IDC Financial Insights and ACI Worldwide conducted a survey across nine markets of 2,000 customers to understand where payments stand currently and how they will evolve. According to the results, China is a major user of the smartphone wallet technology with over 70% of those using online payment options using this technology.

In Australia, the number is a mere 5%. The main reason behind Australia recording such a low figure is that the bulk of the population has bank accounts and uses credit cards as opposed to using their smartphones for transactions. On the other hand, in emerging markets like China and India, a huge proportion of the population does not have a bank account. Hence, they opt for mobile solutions instead of plastic money.

India has become a prominent market for e-wallets after the recent demonetisation of high-denomination currency forced the population to explore alternative payment systems. Paytm is the market leader in India followed by Freecharge, MobiKwik and Oxigen.

Bipin Preet Singh, founder & CEO, MobiKwik, says, “The dynamic mobile wallet started with recharges less than a decade ago and has now seen adoption across payments sectors. Innovations such as cash loading in wallets have led to tremendous increase in user base.” The company reported a growth in user of 10 million in November alone and saw transactions multiply up to 18 times.

Denmark is in the forefront when it comes to cashless payments. In 2013, its biggest bank Danske Bank developed an app called ‘MobilePay’ through which you can transfer money with your smartphone. In 2015, more than half the population used the app to make payments.

Industry experts believe that these numbers will only grow in the near future and they say that usage can be accelerated by making the payment process simpler for customers. The market for digital wallets is vast and there is untapped potential, which can be realised when consumers see a clear value proposition.

The post Why digital wallets are a hit in China, India appeared first on International Finance.