The market was valued at USD 5.1 billion in 2025 and is expected to reach USD 22.2 billion by 2033, expanding at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 20.4% from 2026 to 2033.

“The growing convergence of artificial intelligence and energy infrastructure is reshaping how electricity is generated, distributed, stored, and consumed. As energy systems become more decentralized and data-intensive, AI is emerging as a critical enabler of predictive analytics, demand forecasting, asset optimization, and real-time operational intelligence. The increasing deployment of smart meters, intelligent sensors, connected energy assets, and advanced grid management systems has created unprecedented volumes of operational data. Energy providers are leveraging AI-powered platforms to transform this data into actionable insights, enabling faster decision-making, lower maintenance costs, and improved service reliability,” Grand View Research noted.

According to the agency, the energy and utility markets are being driven by the rising digitalization of energy infrastructure and the growing need for efficient management of generation, transmission, and distribution networks. AI solutions are helping utilities identify equipment failures before they occur, monitor grid performance in real time, and automate complex operational processes.

“These capabilities are becoming increasingly important as energy providers face growing pressure to enhance reliability while supporting the transition toward cleaner and more sustainable energy systems,” the study noted further.

One of the most significant growth drivers for AI in the energy market is the rapid expansion of renewable energy generation. Solar and wind resources introduce variability into power systems, creating new challenges for grid operators responsible for balancing supply and demand. Artificial intelligence technologies enable advanced forecasting models that analyze weather patterns, historical generation trends, and real-time operational conditions to improve renewable energy output predictions and optimize dispatch decisions. These capabilities allow utilities and energy companies to better manage fluctuating renewable generation while maintaining grid stability,” Grand View Research said.

The report also highlights that renewable energy management accounted for 33.0% of the global market in 2025, making it the largest application segment. Growing investments in renewable power infrastructure, battery storage systems, and distributed energy resources continue to strengthen demand for AI-powered energy management platforms that are capable of enhancing grid stability and maximizing asset performance.

Beyond renewable energy management, AI is also gaining significant traction across predictive maintenance, energy trading optimization, grid automation, and operational safety applications.

“Energy companies are increasingly utilizing machine learning algorithms to identify anomalies, reduce downtime, and improve maintenance planning for critical infrastructure assets. AI-powered predictive maintenance solutions help operators monitor equipment health in real time, minimizing costly outages and extending asset lifecycles. The growing use of advanced analytics also enables utilities to optimize energy distribution networks, improve customer service, and enhance overall operational efficiency,” the agency remarked.

Along with the evolution of AI capabilities, robotics is also emerging as one of the fastest-growing application areas within the energy sector. As per Grand View Research, AI-enabled robots and drones are increasingly being deployed to inspect power plants, transmission networks, pipelines, wind farms, and solar facilities. These technologies are providing continuous monitoring capabilities while reducing risks associated with hazardous or remote-site inspections.

According to Grand View Research, the robotics segment will expand at a CAGR (Compound Annual Growth Rate) of 24.1% through 2033, reflecting growing industry investments in automation technologies designed to improve safety, operational visibility, and infrastructure management.

“From a technology perspective, software and platform-based solutions continue to dominate industry spending. The report indicates that the solutions segment accounted for 69.2% of total market revenue in 2025, reflecting widespread adoption of AI-powered applications supporting forecasting, analytics, grid optimization, and operational automation. Organizations across the energy value chain are investing in intelligent software platforms capable of delivering actionable insights from large and complex datasets,” the agency noted.

Meanwhile, the services segment is expected to grow at a CAGR of 22.0% during the forecast period (from 2026 to 2033), driven by tailwinds like increasing demand for consulting, implementation, integration, training, and support services associated with AI deployments.

“Regionally, North America accounted for 38.2% of global revenue in 2025, maintaining its position as the largest regional market for AI in energy applications. Strong investments in digital transformation initiatives, advanced utility infrastructure, smart grid technologies, and AI innovation ecosystems continue to support market growth throughout the region. The United States remains a key contributor to market expansion, with increasing adoption of intelligent energy management systems, predictive maintenance solutions, and renewable energy optimization technologies. According to the report, the US market is projected to expand at a CAGR exceeding 21.8% through 2033,” Grand View Research mentioned.

“Industry experts note that the growing intersection between AI adoption and energy demand is becoming an increasingly important strategic issue. As AI workloads expand globally, data centers are consuming larger amounts of electricity, creating additional requirements for grid modernization, power management optimization, and infrastructure resilience. This trend is expected to accelerate investments in intelligent energy technologies capable of improving efficiency and supporting future electricity demand growth,” it added further.

Utilities and energy providers are increasingly exploring AI-powered solutions to address both operational challenges and long-term sustainability objectives. The competitive landscape also includes a mix of global technology leaders, industrial automation providers, and specialized AI software companies focused on transforming energy operations through advanced analytics and machine learning technologies. Companies like Siemens AG, ABB, General Electric, C3.ai, Atos SE, Flex, AppOrchid, Uptake Technologies, Origami Energy, Alpiq, and SmartCloud are becoming part of this growing yet competitive ecosystem.

“These companies are investing heavily in product innovation, strategic partnerships, and digital energy solutions designed to improve grid reliability, optimize asset performance, and support the transition toward cleaner energy systems,” Grand View Research concluded.

The post AI in energy and utilities market to reach USD 22.2 billion by 2033, says research appeared first on International Finance.

“In 2025, the bank reported an 8:1 ratio in favour of renewable energy financing compared to fossil fuel investment, highlighting a structural shift in Africa’s energy landscape. The trend is further reflected in the growing focus of utilities and energy companies on renewable development, including new initiatives from traditionally coal-reliant utility operators such as Eskom,” Standard Bank noted.

As part of its broader sustainability strategy, Standard Bank has committed to mobilising R100 billion in green finance by 2028, with the aim of supporting the continent’s energy transition and electricity access expansion.

Noting that nearly 600 million people in Africa still lack reliable access to power, Standard Bank’s head of sustainability, Boitumelo Sethlatswe, while interacting with Bizcommunity.com, underscored the scale of investment required in generation, transmission and supporting the energy and utility infrastructure.

“The shift toward renewables reflects a structural change in how energy systems are being developed across Africa, with clean energy becoming central to capacity expansion rather than a marginal addition,” Sethlatswe stated further, while noting that the transition to renewables is not solely focused on emissions reduction but also on improving energy access, supporting inclusive economic growth and building resilience against climate and economic shocks.

Sasha Cook, Standard Bank’s head of sustainable finance for corporate and investment banking, said capital flows are increasingly defining the pace of Africa’s energy transition, with strong fundamentals and improving project economics driving investment into renewables.

As per Standard Bank, it had already mobilised 62% of its R450 billion sustainable finance target by the 2025-end, including R47.1 billion in green finance during the year alone.

“Recent transactions include financing large-scale solar and wind projects in South Africa, such as the 506 MW Khauta South and West Solar projects, the 465 MW Ummbila Emoyeni wind portfolio, and the 400 MW Overberg Wind Farm,” the bank stated further.

The bank, also involved in supporting integrated energy ecosystem-related elements like hybrid energy systems, storage solutions and energy trading structures, remarked, “Renewable energy investment is creating new industrial value chains and supporting wider economic development across the continent, although regulatory and infrastructure constraints continue to limit deployment in some markets. Addressing these barriers will require coordinated action between governments, financiers and private sector players as Africa scales up its clean energy capacity.”

The post Eyeing electricity access expansion, Standard Bank to finance Africa’s renewable boom appeared first on International Finance.

As per Engie’s Spanish unit (Engie Espana), the solar project will be built alongside the 790.68-MW Castelnou plant in the province of Teruel and will include more than 284,000 photovoltaic panels spread across 360 hectares.

“The hybridization scheme will optimize the complementarity between gas-fired and renewable generation, helping to integrate more solar power into the electricity system while maintaining flexible generation capacity to support grid stability,” the company remarked.

Engie Espana announced the plans as it marked the 20th anniversary of the Castelnou plant, which entered operation in 2006 and is the only combined-cycle gas plant in Teruel province.

“The facility, equipped with two gas turbines and one steam turbine supplied by Mitsubishi, operates with an efficiency of more than 55%. The addition of the solar farm is part of the site’s technological evolution and supports its strategy of reducing emissions while maintaining security of electricity supply,” Engie Espana said.

Talking about Engie’s renewable energy portfolio in the Aragon region, the company has assets including the 194-MW Goya wind complex, which consists of seven wind farms in Zaragoza province, and the Phoenix project, a group of ten wind farms with more than 340 MW of installed capacity.

However, Engie is expanding its renewable portfolio in other parts of the European country as well. In April this year, the company acquired 278 MW/1,112 MWh of battery energy storage system (BESS) projects under development in Andalusia, southern Spain.

It bought the projects from Spanish developer Rolwind Renovables, which has been working on them since 2022. The acquired package includes the 200-MW/800-MWh Palmosilla project in Tarifa and the 78-MW/312-MWh Cerrillo project in Alora. While these two projects represent the largest standalone battery storage developments currently in progress in Spain, they will also be including synchronous condensers to enhance grid inertia and improve system reliability.

Construction is scheduled to begin in the first half of 2027, with commissioning targeted for 2028. Total investment, on the other hand, is expected to exceed EUR 240 million (USD 280.4 million) between 2026 and 2028. The projects have also received EUR 70 million in grants from the European Regional Development Fund.

The post After acquiring BESS projects in Andalusia, Engie expands its Spanish portfolio further appeared first on International Finance.

According to the department, the policy will now cover villa owners and residential buildings, enabling the latter to generate and store electricity from rooftop solar systems and efficiently integrate their usage with the grid.

The latest initiative is part of DoE’s mandate to develop policies and regulatory frameworks that advance the Emirati city’s transition towards a more efficient and sustainable energy system, while promoting the adoption of smart and flexible solutions for energy production and consumption.

“This builds on the success of the policy’s first phase, launched during the World Government Summit in February, which enabled owners of farms, rest houses, and ranches to benefit from solar energy solutions for self-generation and storage of electricity, improving consumption efficiency. The expansion reflects the growing uptake of renewable energy solutions among customers and aligns with national objectives to meet the increasing demand for energy through advanced solutions serving all sectors,” reported Emirates News Agency.

“The new phase focuses on facilitating adoption through a simplified regulatory framework that streamlines installation and grid connection procedures, alongside the standardisation of technical requirements to ensure high levels of safety and operational efficiency. In line with the first phase of the policy, DoE issued a policy on the procurement of efficient consumption appliances, providing a practical framework to support individuals and entities in purchasing and operating the most efficient solutions based on actual performance data and total lifecycle cost, enabling more efficient and sustainable long-term decision-making,” it stated.

“The policy covers key systems that will impact consumption efficiency, including air conditioning and cooling, water heating, lighting, and electrical appliances, as well as pumps, motors, and irrigation systems. It also highlights best operational practices, smart control solutions, and regular maintenance, contributing to reduced energy and water consumption, lower peak loads, and enhanced economic and environmental efficiency,” DoE remarked.

Under the second phase, customers will be enabled to meet a significant share of their daily energy consumption during daytime, allowing them to store electricity through battery storage systems, substantially reducing pressure on the grid and improving electricity load management across Abu Dhabi and the UAE.

“The second phase of the Solar Energy Self-Supply Policy represents a significant step in advancing the policy’s implementation, integrating the residential sector to enhance energy consumption efficiency and support the integration of the power system,” said Abdulaziz Mohammed Al Obaidli, Director-General of Regulatory Affairs at the DoE.

“We are strengthening partnerships in the transition towards clean energy, contributing to a more balanced and sustainable energy mix by empowering a broader segment of society,” he concluded.

The post Abu Dhabi launches phase two of solar policy, residential sector to get coverage appeared first on International Finance.

However, Asia is also the region that, according to the International Energy Agency (IEA), has two growth engines: China and India, which are leading the continent’s renewable adaptation campaign. Southeast Asian countries also possess immense potential. Should the region double down on green sources to future-proof its energy security and economic outlook?

Rana Adib, the Executive Director of REN21, the global network of diverse stakeholders that enables the necessary changes to build the renewables economy for prosperous lives and societies, shared her insights on Asia’s renewable pursuit in an exclusive interview with International Finance.

An engineer by training, Rana Adib has worked in the private sector and applied research in the fields of renewable energy, energy access, waste management, and the biomethane sector. With her cross-functional profile, she likes to provide solutions that pave the way for a world built on renewable energy. She is also the chair of SLOCAT, an international multi-stakeholder partnership enabling knowledge and action for sustainable, low-carbon transport.

Here are the excerpts from the interview

With crude oil staying above $100 and disruptions in the Gulf, how do you see the global economy coping with this prolonged energy crisis?

In the short term, countries are focused on securing supply and managing demand through measures such as stock releases, subsidies and supply diversification. These can help cushion the immediate impact, but they do not address the underlying structural exposure. With around 20% of global oil trade passing through the Strait of Hormuz, disruptions quickly translate into higher energy prices, inflationary pressure and impacts on industrial competitiveness, particularly in import-dependent economies across Asia and Europe.

This situation highlights a broader point: systems that rely heavily on traded fossil fuels remain inherently exposed to geopolitical risks and price volatility.

After repeated energy shocks since 2022, do you think renewables are shifting from an option to a necessity?

Yes — increasingly, this shift is being driven by affordability, efficiency and resilience. Renewables are now among the lowest-cost sources of new power in many regions and offer greater price stability, unlike fossil fuels, whose costs are subject to global market fluctuations. As prices rise, households and industries are directly affected, while renewables combined with electrification can reduce long-term exposure to these shocks.

At the same time, energy efficiency is becoming more central. Electrified solutions such as electric vehicles and heat pumps are significantly more efficient than combustion-based systems, meaning less energy is required to deliver the same services — helping to lower costs and reduce vulnerability. Countries that rely heavily on imported fossil fuels remain structurally exposed. By contrast, systems built on renewables, electrification, efficiency and flexibility can improve resilience over time. In this context, renewables are increasingly seen not only as a climate solution, but as a key component of economic stability and energy security.

What is the likelihood of Asian governments accelerating the transition to alternatives beyond petrol, diesel, and gas?

In many cases, the current context is likely to reinforce this direction, although the transition may not be linear. Some governments may adopt short-term measures involving fossil fuels to manage immediate pressures. At the same time, the crisis is strengthening the case for electric mobility, public transport, clean electricity, storage and heat pumps, as well as for expanding domestic renewable energy supply. Given Asia’s significant reliance on imported fuels, there is a growing incentive to reduce exposure through electrification, energy efficiency and locally available renewable resources.

With global EV sales reaching 1.1 million units in February 2026, do you expect this growth to sustain or peak soon?

The outlook is likely to be more nuanced rather than indicating a clear peak. Overall, car sales may face downward pressure due to weaker consumer spending and broader economic uncertainty. However, the key trend is that the share of EVs within total car sales continues to increase. EVs represented over 20% of global car sales in 2024 and are on track to exceed 25% in 2025. In leading markets, shares are already significantly higher, including around 50% in China, while others such as South Korea (around 10%), Japan (around 2%–3%) and India (around 3%) remain at earlier stages, highlighting significant room for growth.

This suggests that accelerating investment in EVs, charging infrastructure and enabling policies could play an important role in reducing fuel import dependence and strengthening energy security.

Should automakers prioritise affordability to meet rising EV demand?

Affordability is now central to the next phase of EV adoption. Automakers are already shifting in this direction, driven by weaker consumer demand, geopolitical pressures and rising competition. At the same time, EV economics have improved significantly. In many markets, EVs are already cheaper to own and operate over their lifetime, and upfront costs are moving toward parity. The challenge is therefore no longer technology, but access — ensuring affordable options, financing and scale for mass-market adoption.

With countries like China, India, and Japan leading renewable adoption, should other Asian economies follow more aggressively?

The broader regional trend suggests increasing momentum, but the current crisis also shows that the transition is not always linear. In the short term, many countries are focused on securing fuel supply and managing demand, including subsidies, diversification, and emergency measures. However, this situation is already reinforcing the case for accelerating renewables, electrification and energy efficiency as more durable solutions.

China and India continue to drive large-scale renewable deployment, while Japan is expanding within a more constrained system. South Korea is also pursuing more ambitious renewable expansion plans, particularly in solar and offshore wind. At the same time, other Asian economies remain at earlier stages, highlighting significant room for growth. Countries that have already expanded domestic renewable capacity are generally less exposed to price volatility, which is becoming an increasingly important consideration.

Scaling up renewables, electrification, and efficiency can help reduce exposure to volatile fuel import costs, in addition to improving resilience to external shocks, supporting domestic economic development and new industries. In this context, accelerating the transition is increasingly seen not only as a climate priority, but as a strategic economic and energy security decision.

Despite leading Asia’s renewable adoption charge, Japan and South Korea are feeling the brunt of the global energy crisis, given their dependence on imported fuel. Should these nations take a hard look at their energy sourcing practices?

The current crisis underscores the structural dependence of both countries on imported fuels. Japan sources the vast majority of its crude oil (around 90%) from the Middle East, while South Korea imports roughly two-thirds from the same region, with much of this supply transiting through key chokepoints, such as the Strait of Hormuz. While both maintain strategic reserves, these provide only a short-term buffer.

Reducing this exposure over time will depend on accelerating domestic renewables, electrification, grid and storage infrastructure, and energy efficiency. More broadly, this reflects a shift in how energy security is being understood, from securing fuel supply to reducing reliance on imported fuels altogether.

Japan, after the 2011 Fukushima disaster, took a backseat in expanding its nuclear industry. Do you see things changing in this front post-Gulf crisis?

Japan’s energy policy had already begun evolving before the current crisis, with a more balanced approach that includes both renewable expansion and a gradual return of nuclear power. The current context may reinforce discussions around nuclear energy in terms of energy security. However, nuclear developments typically involve long timelines and remain subject to public acceptance considerations. In the near term, measures such as accelerating renewables, electrification and energy efficiency are likely to play a more immediate role in strengthening energy resilience.

The post Renewable shift is being driven by affordability, efficiency and resilience: Rana Adib appeared first on International Finance.

Antony Froggatt, Senior Director for Aviation, Climate, Energy, and Shipping at T&E, a Brussels-based NGO advocating clean transport and energy, told International Finance, “Many forecasters, such as the IMF (If energy prices sustain just a 10% increase over one year, this would add 0.4 percentage point to inflation and slow economic growth by 0.1%-0.2%,) and Fitch, suggest that higher energy prices will negatively affect global inflation and reduce global growth. The extent of these will depend on how high prices get, and how long they remain high.”

Jan Rosenow, Professor of Energy and Climate Policy at Oxford University and Senior Associate at Cambridge University, said, “The short-term pain is real. Higher inflation, squeezed household budgets, and recession risk in energy-intensive economies. But the adjustment mechanisms are also kicking in: strategic reserve releases, demand destruction, and accelerated supply from non-Gulf producers. The deeper concern is duration. A shock that lasts months reshapes investment decisions in ways that a spike lasting weeks does not.”

Clean energy pivot: A Must For Asia Now

In 2026, Asia has become the Europe of 2022. Back then, Russia, in response to the Western sanctions for the Ukraine war, significantly cut natural gas supplies to the continent, resulting in high energy prices and a cost-of-living crisis. Asia, which buys more than 80% of the crude that transits the Strait of Hormuz, is now facing an “energy emergency.”

This could prompt Asia to have a re-look at renewables and initiatives to future- proof both its energy security and economic outlook.

Froggatt commented, “I would argue that renewables have been a necessity for some time, and the economic case for them is even stronger now. As far back as 2020, the International Energy Agency called solar PV the ‘cheapest source of electricity in history’. Since then, the costs of not only renewables (solar and wind), but also storage options, particularly batteries, have continued to fall.”

Rosenow remarked, “Each successive shock – 2022, and now this – makes the economic and security case for domestic clean energy harder to ignore. Renewables are not just cheaper in many markets; they are now the geopolitically safer choice. The question is no longer whether to accelerate the transition but how fast institutions can move.”

EV: The Best Starting Point

Stating that higher fossil fuel prices affect consumers’ cost of living and the balance of payments of importing countries, Froggatt believes episodes like the 1970s global oil price spikes, and the European energy crisis in 2022 will only motivate policymakers to accelerate their efforts to limit their dependence on fossil fuels for economic and supply security reasons.

“We saw this in the EU with the introduction of the ‘Fit for 55’ package in 2022 to accelerate the transition away from imported fossil fuels. However, the majority of these measures will take time to have an effect. If we want to really reduce dependency on fossil fuel, structural changes with new investment are needed, particularly in infrastructure, such as the grids and buildings,” he stated.

Rosenow, on the other hand, remarked, “The pressure is certainly there. Asia bears the heaviest volumetric burden from Hormuz disruptions, and governments that were already energy-insecure are now facing acute supply anxiety. I’d expect faster permitting of renewables, more serious electrification policy, and renewed interest in long-term LNG alternatives – though the pace will vary significantly by country.”

To deal with the “energy emergency,” Asian countries are advocating solutions like a four-day workweek and preventing unnecessary travel to save fuel. This might make electric vehicles more attractive.

Froggatt says, “I would assume that sales will continue to increase. Globally, only around 10% of car sales are electric, but in leading countries, such as China and Vietnam, we are already seeing over 40% of car sales being electric. Consequently, as the cost of electric vehicles continues to fall and charging infrastructure becomes more available and robust, the pace of sales growth will accelerate, especially in an era of high fossil fuel prices.”

Froggatt also pointed out that in Europe, car manufacturers have failed to develop smaller, low-cost EVs fast enough. This is part of the reason why Chinese vehicles are entering the EU market so quickly.

“I think it is incumbent on all car manufacturers to make EVs to meet a variety of consumer requirements, which include those that are most affordable,” he said.

So, Asia should focus on the affordability factor, introducing tax credits for consumers, apart from setting up intensive charging networks.

“There have been significant cost reductions already. And in many markets, EVs are close to or at cost-parity over their lifetime. Further cost reductions are needed to shift the market faster to EVs,” Rosenow noted, while adding, “The underlying drivers – policy support, falling battery costs, expanding model ranges – remain intact. Short-term, high fuel prices actually reinforce the EV value proposition. The risk to growth is on the supply side: critical mineral availability and manufacturing capacity. I don’t see a near-term peak, but the rate of growth will inevitably moderate as markets mature.”

The Continent Holds Promise

As per the International Energy Agency’s (IEA) Renewables 2025 report, two of Asia’s growth engines, China and India, along with the United States and Europe, were responsible for clean energy’s global expansion. Southeast Asia holds promises too. With an estimated 20 terawatts of untapped solar and wind potential (equivalent to around 55 times the region’s current total power capacity), the IEA sees the region as being more than capable of securing its energy security through the renewable route.

“The case for doing so has never been stronger. Energy import dependence is now visibly a security and economic liability, not just an environmental one. Southeast Asian economies, in particular, have strong renewable resource endowments – solar, geothermal, offshore wind – that remain underexploited. The Gulf crisis should be the catalyst for a serious regional rethink,” Rosenow said.

Froggatt too observed, “It is not just countries in Asia that can and should accelerate their use of renewable energy. Without accelerating deployment in the EU, the 2030 renewable energy target of at least 42.5% of energy from renewables will not be met. In developing countries, renewable energy is a way to meet rapidly increasing demand. Governments can take several steps to support the renewable energy sector. They can reduce construction risks and costs through accelerated planning, grants, soft loans, and other measures. Furthermore, they can implement support schemes, such as contracts for difference or feed-in tariffs, that create stable revenues. Governments can also help develop local supply chains, which provide additional price security and create local jobs. Finally, governments can set targets for renewable energy use, which gives confidence to investors.”

While noting that higher rates will raise the cost of capital precisely when deployment needs to accelerate, Rosenow advised, “The policy response matters enormously here: blended finance, public guarantees, and development bank support can reduce the risk premium that makes projects unfinanceable in the private market alone. Countries that get this right will attract investment; those that don’t will fall behind.”

Despite investing heavily in offshore wind, solar, and hydrogen strategies, Japan and South Korea still fulfil a massive chunk of their energy requirements through imported fossil fuels. Both of them are feeling the Hormuz pinch right now.

Rosenow said, “This crisis is a stress test they (Japan and South Korea) were always likely to fail. Both countries have made genuine progress in renewables but remain structurally dependent on imported fossil fuels in ways that leave them exposed to exactly this kind of shock. A serious reassessment of domestic generation capacity is overdue.”

Maybe, it’s time for Japan to shed the ghost of Fukushima.

Froggatt said, “Electricity generated from renewable energy is, under most conditions, far cheaper than that generated by nuclear power. In addition, renewable energy generation is much quicker to build. Therefore, although some countries may look again at nuclear power, I think that the higher costs and slowness to build – especially in countries that don’t already have a nuclear sector – will reduce the number of countries that actually start building nuclear power plants.”

Rosenow concluded, “The political and public calculus on nuclear in Japan was already shifting before this crisis, with several reactors being restarted. A prolonged Gulf disruption accelerates that conversation considerably. Energy security concerns now outweigh, for many policymakers, the post-Fukushima caution. I would expect Japan to move more decisively on restarts over the next few years.”

The post IF Insights: War in Middle East likely to accelerate Asia’s renewable energy revolution appeared first on International Finance.

The start-up aims to utilise large solar arrays in geosynchronous orbit, approximately 22,000 miles above Earth, where satellites synchronise with the planet’s rotation to harvest sunlight. The breakthrough technology will then use infrared lasers to transmit that power to utility-scale solar farms on Earth, allowing these facilities to send power to the grid nearly around the clock.

Building Up The Concept Called Space Solar Energy

The concept of “Space Solar Energy” is taking shape quite nicely in the United States and will likely lead the next-generation clean energy research and development efforts. Among the players taking the lead in the research and development-related efforts in this arena, we have Overview Energy.

As the start-up plan revealed its use of the world’s solar panels as nighttime collectors of power beaming down from space, it also raised USD 20 million, and part of that has now gone toward an airborne demonstration of the start-up’s power-beaming technology. A light aircraft, in November 2025, transmitted power using a laser to a ground receiver over a distance of five kilometres (three miles).

However, Overview Energy will be up against competitors like renewable energy player Aetherflux, which is also pursuing a laser-based approach. Then there are ventures like Emrod (pioneering commercially viable long-range wireless power transfer technology), Orbital Composites (a venture redefining additive manufacturing with advanced composites and robotic automation), and Virtus Solis (which has reportedly designed the world’s first space-based solar power energy generation system) that are developing their versions of microwave-based power transmission, which sends energy wirelessly using a different portion of the electromagnetic spectrum than Aetherflux and Overview.

Betting Big On Microwaves

Microwaves are less sensitive to clouds and humidity than infrared lasers, while the latter can’t transmit in cloudy weather since the suspended water droplets would absorb much of the energy. However, since microwave-based systems can’t reuse existing solar farms, they would have to build their own ground stations.

Also, the ground receivers need to be smaller in shape so that they can keep the costs down. In that case, the energy beams need to be tighter and more powerful to make sure they get caught by the receivers efficiently, without causing collateral damage to birds and aircraft.

While renewable industry players are working to address these challenges, Overview Energy has pitched the reuse of solar farms to mitigate some of those concerns. However, the real deal will be to convince people that energy beams from space are safe and won’t stray off target.

Also, the start-up will have to ensure its laser system is very efficient to prevent a situation where solar energy is converted to infrared light and back again.

The start-up is targeting a 2028 timeline to launch a satellite into low Earth orbit, far below the 36,000 kilometres (22,000 miles) at which it finally intends to operate. The satellite will start sending megawatts’ worth of power from geosynchronous orbit from 2030 onwards.

The innovation will also be facing two more rivals: cheaper grid-scale batteries, which are rewriting the United States’ energy storage rulebook, and nuclear fusion in the long run.

What prevented “space solar energy” from elevating from the concept stage to the commercial one were factors like expensive launches, fragile hardware, and, most importantly, the fact that the technology to beam power safely to Earth wasn’t ready.

However, with the rise of the private space industry, launch costs have dropped more than tenfold, and annual launches have grown massively as well. Mass manufacturing of satellites is now routine. High-efficiency photovoltaics and high-power, high-efficiency lasers have become inexpensive, reliable, and commercially available.

The start-up has set a standard for its action plan of sending megawatts’ worth of power from geosynchronous orbit: transmission must be completely safe for people, wildlife, aircraft, and other satellites, while the whole process should cost less than USD 1 billion, which will make it competitive with its industry rivals.

The start-up also plans to use significantly less land than traditional solar plants with battery storage. The solution has a distributed design, eliminating any single point of failure.

Taking A Pragmatic Path

Overview Energy’s satellites will operate at an altitude of approximately 36,000 kilometres (about 22,000 miles) in geosynchronous orbit, collecting sunlight continuously and transmitting it as low-intensity, invisible infrared light.

Since Overview Energy will be using existing solar projects as its infrared beam receivers, requirements such as new land, construction, and years-long waits for interconnection will be eliminated. The start-up’s satellites will be the first moving power plants, directing energy across regions in seconds and across continents in minutes.

This will lead to a situation where solar projects will be generating revenue during 65%-75% of operational hours, without making their assets sit idle. Utilities will be bypassing congested corridors and drawing on infinite energy reserves above the atmosphere. Households will see lower electricity costs, as satellites will be blunting the peaks that drive price spikes.

Off-takers like data centres will have access to massive energy capacity, which will help them come online in days instead of years.

The business is currently busy solving problems such as sourcing cost-efficient materials, precise tracking, and deployable architecture. The whole operational architecture is being tested and validated from lab to aircraft to orbit. Each phase is demonstrating the same core technology that will operate in space, focusing on real-world constraints, while helping the start-up inch toward its cost targets.

Airborne Demo Bringing The Concept To Reality

In November 2025, the start-up achieved a world first in power beaming, as it transmitted power from a moving aeroplane to solar panels on the ground, covering a distance of more than 5,000 metres in the process.

Overview Energy’s team installed laser and optical systems on a Cessna Caravan and flew at an altitude of over 5,000 m (16,500 ft). On the ground, it installed a receiver of standard solar panels, the same kind used in utility-scale projects or homes.

As the aircraft flew overhead, the system identified the receiver, locked onto it, and delivered power through an eye-safe beam. The panels convert that light into electricity in the same way they convert sunlight.

The whole experiment validated the performance of Overview Energy’s core technical pieces that will realise the concept of “Space Solar Energy.” The proof-of-concept phase has also been completed with the airborne technology demonstration. It will now be followed by a pilot low Earth orbit (LEO) mission in 2028 that will demonstrate the full system’s performance in space. The final step will be the Overview Energy’s geosynchronous orbit (GEO) satellites taking over the proceedings in 2029–2030, where they will see the sun 99% of the time.

The post Start-up of the Week: Overview Energy bets on space-based solar power appeared first on International Finance.

Some of SOCAR Capital’s notable achievements include improving financial literacy, attracting passive cash funds, enhancing access for Azerbaijani companies to capital markets, and facilitating activities within the corporate bond market in Azerbaijan.

Recently, International Finance named SOCAR Capital as the “Best New Bond for Green Project Financing – Energy – Azerbaijan 2025”.

Upon winning the award, SOCAR Capital CEO Samir Kerimli said, “This achievement reflects SOCAR’s strategic decision to introduce modern, sustainability-focused financing instruments into Azerbaijan’s capital markets, and I am proud that SOCAR Capital served as the execution arm behind this important initiative.”

SOCAR is known for initiating and issuing USD 200 million “green” bonds. From the early stages, the company took it upon itself to ensure that this initiative was implemented with the highest financial, structural, and operational standards.

“We designed the transaction for the domestic market, structured the financial terms, coordinated with investors, and ensured that the product was accessible, transparent, and aligned with the sustainability goals set by SOCAR,” Samir Kerimli added.

With a five-year maturity, a 6% annual coupon, and quarterly interest payments in US dollars, the bond was built to meet the expectations of local investors seeking both financial stability and meaningful participation in the country’s environmental transformation.

“The strong demand from individual and institutional investors showed that the Azerbaijani market is ready for sustainability-oriented instruments and is increasingly motivated to support long-term ESG priorities,” Kerimli noted.

One of the most important elements of this issuance is the direct allocation of proceeds to SOCAR Green, the entity responsible for designing and implementing SOCAR’s renewable energy and decarbonisation agenda. For SOCAR, every dollar raised from the public needed to contribute to real, measurable environmental progress.

These funds are now being directed toward projects such as renewable energy development, energy-efficiency upgrades, methane-emission reduction technologies, flare-gas recovery, and digital optimisation across SOCAR Group.

SOCAR has also strengthened its overall ESG standing internationally. In 2024, it received an initial BBB ESG rating from MSCI, making it the first energy company in the Caspian region to attain this level. This rating reflects SOCAR’s progress in emissions reduction, waste management, biodiversity protection, safety performance, governance, transparency, and stakeholder engagement.

For the company, this recognition reaffirms that the company’s sustainability transformation is being validated not only through financial instruments but also through independent global assessments. It also supports SOCAR’s long-term strategy for responsible growth and aligns with the company’s environmental and governance commitments.

“From SOCAR Capital’s perspective, these achievements demonstrate how a financial institution can serve as an effective facilitator of strategic sustainability goals. SOCAR defines the vision and environmental priorities; our responsibility is to create robust, transparent, and investable financial structures that make this vision achievable. This collaboration model ensures that environmental transformation is backed not only by strategic intent but also by strong financial execution,” Kerimli told International Finance.

SOCAR Capital believes that strengthening Azerbaijan’s internal financial ecosystem is crucial for long-term economic resilience. By introducing a “green” instrument into the local market, the venture enabled Azerbaijani investors to participate directly in the financing of the country’s sustainability transition. This aligns with SOCAR Capital’s mission to transform itself into a modern financial platform that brings global market practices into the local environment.

“For me, this award is not only a recognition of a successful transaction — it is a validation of a broader shift happening in our financial markets. The appetite for ESG-linked investments is growing. Investors are more informed, more engaged, and more willing to support long-term environmental objectives. The improvements reflected in SOCAR’s MSCI BBB rating further demonstrate that sustainability has become a strategic pillar shaping the company’s development trajectory,” the CEO added.

SOCAR Capital is now planning to expand its work in ESG-aligned financing. The company is exploring new thematic instruments, enhanced reporting practices, and deeper collaboration with partners who prioritise sustainability.

“Our objective is clear: to continue being the financial execution engine that supports SOCAR’s transformation into a more energy-efficient, sustainable, and future-oriented organisation. This recognition from International Finance motivates us to move forward with even greater confidence. It encourages us to align financial innovation with environmental responsibility. I believe this combination will define the next chapter of SOCAR’s development and Azerbaijan’s capital market evolution,” Samir Kerimli concluded.

The post SOCAR Capital boosts ESG financing in Azerbaijan appeared first on International Finance.

Thanks to the “Go Green” theme of the 21st-century global economy, investors are now eager to spend trillions on energy transition, but at the same time, too much money is piling into mature projects, with high-risk innovations struggling to attract backing. Will there be enough money in the world to save the planet? It is an urgent question that has a complicated answer.

Big-picture forecasters identify the enormous amounts required to fund a more environmentally friendly future, as well as the equally intimidating gaps in obtaining them. According to European financier Allianz, to meet the globally agreed-upon 2030 emissions targets, investment in the energy transition must more than double to $4.05 trillion annually. In a 2023 report, the Boston Consulting Group (BCG), a United States-based firm, projects a net-zero “capital gap” of $18 trillion.

The situation looks even more dire for 2025. With his promise to “drill, baby, drill” for oil and gas, United States President Donald Trump has reclaimed the presidency and will eliminate the generous green subsidies that his predecessor, Joe Biden, had advanced through the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA). High energy costs and farmer protests are undermining support for Europe’s ambitious transition agenda, while Canada is about to repeal its historic carbon tax.

In financial markets, the cost of capital-intensive energy infrastructure is continuing to rise due to persistently high interest rates. A return to reliance on fossil fuels is being prompted by the AI-driven surge in data centre construction, which is driving up electricity demand estimates.

According to Richard de los Reyes, a portfolio manager at T. Rowe Price’s New Era Fund, one of these data centres can consume as much electricity as a small city. The need for natural gas to meet demand is increasingly recognised.

Mismatched realities

However, practitioners in the financial trenches who are raising capital and structuring deals have a very different perspective. They are concerned about pursuing too few green investments with too much capital.

According to Alex Leung, head of infrastructure research and strategy at UBS Asset Management, “I continue to firmly believe that the megatrends of decarbonisation and digitalisation will revolutionise our way of life. However, these sectors are becoming increasingly crowded. The world of renewable energy is becoming more and more fragmented from a financial standpoint. How can both be true? Capital is plentiful, but it is largely concentrated in a small number of established green technologies, while more creative or untested industries have difficulty obtaining funding.”

On the one hand, investors can support well-established, reasonably priced technologies with the realistic hope of a consistent, multi-decade payout. Since economies of scale and a boom in Chinese equipment have driven the costs of solar and onshore wind power below those of fossil fuels, they have entered this category. Then there are technologies like offshore wind that have high costs and unknown risks, or technologies like carbon capture or green hydrogen that show promise but have not yet turned a profit. For these projects to become commercially viable, they still need government assistance or wealthy corporate backers.

Antoine Saint Olive, global head of infrastructure and energy finance at Natixis Capital and Investment Banking in Paris, said, “Everyone wants to be part of the energy transition on paper. But when you have a real deal on your desk, in many cases, you are talking about new technologies.”

As investors lament over crowded trades, this mismatch, between a surplus of capital for proven projects and a shortage for riskier innovations, helps explain why trillions are still required. The most important agreements arguably lie in the intersection of established and emerging technologies: rapidly evolving solar and wind energy storage systems and the modifications to grids required to transmit them. Without improved customer delivery, renewable energy investments will eventually reach a ceiling, and in certain locations, they may have already.

According to Rebecca Fitz, a partner at BCG and a founding member of the company’s Centre for Energy Impact, current grids can generally handle renewable energy until it accounts for 15% of their input. She said that there is “a bottleneck in power market design” in some regions of Europe where the percentage is higher than 50%.

Stef Beusmans, an associate partner at Sustainable Capital Group in Amsterdam, said, “Moving green energy from where it’s best produced—Spain and Portugal for solar, the Netherlands for wind—to where it’s needed is particularly challenging due to Europe’s patchwork of national grids and regulators. Europe finds it more difficult to really accelerate the deployment of clean energy due to different national support schemes.”

Energy finance at a crossroads

The venerable, obscure world of infrastructure finance, which accounts for roughly 4% of global capital, faces both opportunities and challenges as a result of the energy transition’s immense scope and complexity, according to UBS. In this area, plain vanilla deals are uncommon. Infrastructure investors must structure transactions individually and frequently bear the risk over an extended period of time, but bond underwriters and traders have access to rating agencies and liquid markets to help them manage risk.

According to Leung, “It could take up to a year to structure and close a deal. After that, active management is necessary for many infrastructure assets. This goes beyond simply cutting a coupon.”

As per Marta Perez, who leads the Americas infrastructure debt team at Allianz Capital Partners, green investments present a more complex scenario. She clarifies that established project finance models, originally devised for predictable long-term assets like traditional fossil fuel power plants, must undergo transformation to cater to the variability and often decentralised attributes of renewable energy systems.

Climate activists prioritise a variety of issues, such as building insulation and tree planting. However, electricity is the main issue for investors. According to BCG, approximately 90% of the $18 trillion net-zero capital gap is attributable to electric vehicles and other “end uses” of electricity.

Allianz reports that in 2023, “electrified transport” and renewable energy production each accounted for over $600 billion in global spending. Batteries and other energy-related components ranked fourth at $135 billion, while power grid upgrades came in third at $310 billion.

These figures will only rise due to the haste to construct AI data centres, which are huge energy users. According to UBS, the United States will generate an astounding 20% more electricity per year between 2023 and 2026. Leung claims that because the AI craze will require more power from fossil fuels, it will be “slightly negative for decarbonisation in the short term.”

However, AI also draws the world’s renowned tech companies further into the energy transition. Amazon, Microsoft, Alphabet (the parent company of Google), and other hyperscalers that run data centres are still “among the most committed to net-zero,” according to Leung, despite recent conciliation with Trump. They might have to pay more for clean power.

The AI-driven power surge is increasing the role of regulated utilities, which can raise rates to cover their costs. For energy-transition investments, this might offer one of the safest financing options. But public opposition to higher taxes, particularly those aimed at financing Big Tech’s energy appetite, might prove to be a significant barrier.

BCG claims that North American utilities will supply the remaining 35% of the anticipated increases in power demand from natural gas and 60% from renewable sources.

Infrastructure experts believe that Trump is one threat that may be overrated. The length of energy investments— much longer than a single presidential term—makes changes in policy less significant. As per UBS research, Trump will also have difficulty dismantling or repealing the IRA.

Leung and his associates point out that about 70% of the US renewable projects currently in development are in “red” states that supported Trump. In the House of Representatives, 18 Republicans have already signed a letter opposing repeal, which is more than enough to make a difference in the closely divided chamber. It is difficult to determine the exact impact of this resistance, though, because Trump has been avoiding Congress on a regular basis.

Despite being politically conservative, Texas leads the United States in solar and wind energy. More than 70% of Americans nationwide favour increased use of solar and wind power, according to Pew Research.

In the worst-case scenario, according to UBS, Trump will make changes to the IRA rather than abolish it, enabling Republican-led states to finish short-term renewable projects while still giving the President a political win.

China dominates green investing

The largest economy in the world, the US, does not lead the way in green investment. According to CarbonCredits.com, China holds that distinction, investing $818 billion in clean energy in 2024, more than the US, European Union (EU), and the United Kingdom combined. In 2024, the People’s Republic saw a 45.2% increase in solar capacity.

China is also far ahead in its nuclear power plant programme, which may lead to a resurgence in the US, if not Europe. Although nuclear power has other known hazards, it does not emit carbon. Since China is primarily funding its renewable energy advancements domestically, private capital from around the world is looking elsewhere. Europe is still dedicated to a surge in renewable energy to partially replace Russian natural gas imports, which Russian President Vladimir Putin stopped due to sanctions pertaining to Ukraine.

According to the European Investment Bank (EIB), the EU is still investing ten times as much in renewable energy as it is in fossil fuels, despite also placing bets on more liquefied natural gas. To reach the 2030 carbon reduction targets, the bloc’s overall energy-transition investment is predicted to continue increasing, having increased by a third in 2023 to $360 billion.

Other countries are joining in as well. With plans to triple by 2030, India’s renewable capacity jumped to almost half of the US level last year. In India, six significant solar developers have “attracted investments from diverse sources, including foreign institutional investors from North America, Europe, and the Middle East,” according to S&P Global.

Nearly 85% of the record 10.9 GW of power capacity added by Brazil in 2024 came from renewable sources. With an investment of $8.4 billion promised, Saudi Arabia is backing the biggest and most ambitious green hydrogen project in the world, close to Neom, the Kingdom’s “city of the future,” according to Neom.

The objective is to use electric current generated from renewable sources to split water molecules into their hydrogen and oxygen components, then store the hydrogen for use as fuel. Following closely behind, the United Arab Emirates (UAE), Saudi Arabia’s neighbour, is using its plentiful sunshine to power massive renewable energy projects.

Green energy draws investors

Big-ticket investors worldwide remain driven by environmental, social, and governance (ESG) principles, as indicated by Saint Olive of Natixis. Banks still wish to “greenify their balance sheets,” even though they contribute at least as much to infrastructure as institutional investors. Banks outside of the United States do, at least.

Saint Olive noted that banks and sponsors around the world still have ESG ambitions, and the change of a single country’s president will not make them fall apart.

The EIB estimated that private equity investments in green energy would reach $26 billion globally, up from almost nothing before the COVID-19 pandemic. The amount at stake could be many times that amount, given the private equity model’s practice of leveraging up equity holdings.

According to Fitz of BCG, as solar energy gains popularity and Texas lawmakers push legislation that favours fossil fuels, private equity firms in the US are paying special attention to onshore wind generation.

She said, “Private equity is paying more for wind assets. Going forward, they see wind as an essential component of the energy picture.”

One of the biggest obstacles still facing the world is financing the energy transition. When the US Department of Transportation completed the interstate highway system in 1991, it cost $129 billion, making it one of the largest infrastructure projects of the 20th century. The capital requirements for green power in a single year are a tiny portion of that. Utilising tried-and-true technology, the US highway system was funded by the federal government.

Aside from China, governments face significant pressure to transfer as much of the financial burden as possible to the private sector, given the social responsibilities of the 21st century. Saint Olive emphasises that many estimates of the renewable energy transition underestimate the significant costs involved in mining the metals required for constructing batteries, electrical grids, and turbines.

He argues that mining is a “fully merchant business” reliant on fluctuating prices that hinder fixed, infrastructure-style returns, and that it faces no favourable treatment from regulators or the public. He claims that many banks have a negative view of the mining industry from an ESG standpoint. They prefer to let others pay for it.

Nevertheless, despite the White House’s rhetoric, the global energy transition is not only continuing but also accelerating. However, investors in infrastructure are also accustomed to creating custom solutions for a project’s evolving environment.

For construction in the United States, you might have bank loans before looking to the capital markets. European plants could rely on power purchase agreements that last for ten years. Very long-term financing, such as construction plus 25 years, is available in the Middle East.

“Whether the transition will occur quickly enough to prevent ecological disaster is more important than whether it will occur at all. If governments and engineers can work together to produce profitable investments, private finance appears ready to play a role. More capital will come in if projects are generating 20% returns. Although it’s not always discussed, economic viability plays a significant role in the equation,” Leung noted.

Green energy investment is growing, but money flows mostly to proven technologies. Riskier innovations still struggle for funding. If governments and investors collaborate wisely, the world can accelerate the energy transition while keeping projects profitable and sustainable.

The post Big money investors bet on renewables appeared first on International Finance.

In 2024, the world recorded its first calendar year where average global temperatures exceeded 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels. Climate experts caution that this development brings us closer to surpassing the long-term 1.5°C limit established by the 2015 Paris Agreement.

“We must exit this road to ruin, and we have no time to lose,” urged United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres in his 2025 New Year’s message, describing the past decade, which included the ten hottest years on record, as “climate breakdown.”

This barrage of record heat doesn’t mean all is lost, but it is a deafening wake-up call for countries and corporations to act swiftly. Many businesses are stepping up for their bottom line as much as for the planet. Consumers are demanding genuine sustainability and accountability, and as Gen Z and Millennials continue to gain spending power, brands that fail to take real action risk being left behind.

Multiple surveys underscore this generational shift. One study found that 62% of Gen Z shoppers prefer to buy from sustainable brands (and 73% are willing to pay more for sustainable products). Another study found that virtually all Millennial and Gen Z investors are interested in sustainable investing.

“Both Gen Z and Millennials expect sustainability to be part of the baseline – not just a brand add-on,” explains Philippa Cross, founder and CEO of Marshall Sustainability.

She further clarifies, “Research also shows the vast majority of Millennials and Gen Z want to work for companies with strong environmental values.”

With those cohorts projected to make up 74% of the global workforce by 2030, businesses must adapt if they want to attract the next generation of talent.

More companies are setting net-zero targets, greening their offices, and engaging employees in eco-initiatives.

“Companies excel at handling cyber, geopolitical, and operational risks; sustainability should be no different. To win with Gen Z, companies need to understand the risk of inaction or inauthentic action, weigh that against the risk of lost market share, and lean into ESG and sustainable values hard, all underpinned by transparency,” notes Adriel Lubarsky, founder of the climate start-up Beehive Climate.

Token gestures and greenwashing that once sufficed will no longer cut it. Regulators and stakeholders are also turning up the heat. Frameworks like the EU’s Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) are forcing greater transparency and accountability from businesses.

“As sustainability matures, the focus is shifting from glossy commitments to real delivery, especially at the product and service level,” Cross said. She emphasises that true credibility comes from tackling core impacts (like sourcing raw materials responsibly), not just from peripheral tweaks such as recyclable packaging.

How are companies around the globe meeting this challenge? From Patagonia to Apple, several big-name brands are taking concrete steps to reduce their carbon footprints, embrace circular economy principles, and build environmental responsibility into their operations.

Patagonia: Woven in purpose

US-based Patagonia’s retail stores reflect the brand’s ethos of repairing, reusing, and recycling outdoor apparel to extend product life. Patagonia, the adventure clothing brand and certified B-Corp, has been a sustainability trailblazer since 1973. The company, under renowned rock climber and environmentalist Yvon Chouinard, began donating 1% of its sales to environmental causes in 1985.

Chouinard even co-founded the “1% for the Planet” network to encourage other businesses to follow suit, a global movement that now has roughly 5,000 member companies contributing a portion of their revenue to green initiatives.

Over the decades, Patagonia has contributed more than $140 million to grassroots environmental groups, while implementing numerous eco-friendly practices in-house. The company uses only “preferred materials”, such as organic cotton, recycled polyester and nylon, in its products, and it powers 100% of its own retail stores and offices with renewable energy.

The brand actively advocates for a circular economy approach. Its Worn Wear programme invites customers to trade in used Patagonia gear for resale (keeping clothing out of landfills), and its Patagonia Action Works platform connects people with environmental causes.

Patagonia hasn’t shied away from activism either; in 2017, it even joined a lawsuit against the US government to help protect Native American lands (fighting the reduction of Bears Ears National Monument).

Then, in 2022, came perhaps the boldest move: Chouinard transferred ownership of the $3 billion company into a trust and a nonprofit organisation called the Holdfast Collective, ensuring that all Patagonia’s future profits (around $100 million per year) are devoted to fighting climate change and protecting nature.

“We are going to give away the maximum amount of money to people who are actively working on saving this planet. I never wanted to be a businessman… Now I could die tomorrow, and the company is going to continue doing the right thing for the next 50 years, and I don’t have to be around,” Chouinard told The New York Times about the decision.

Patagonia stands as a shining example of aligning profit with purpose, and its approach has clearly resonated with consumers. The company’s revenue reportedly surpassed $1 billion in 2024, showing that a deep commitment to the planet can go hand in hand with business success.

IKEA: Conscious living made truly accessible

IKEA is investing heavily in renewable energy, from massive rooftop solar arrays to wind farms, as it strives to become climate positive. Swedish furniture giant IKEA, long associated with affordable (and often disposable) home goods, has taken significant strides toward sustainability.

Circularity is central to many of its initiatives. For example, IKEA’s buy-back and resell programme lets customers return used IKEA furniture for store credit, giving furnishings a second life rather than sending them to the landfill.

The company is also investing heavily in clean energy. By 2024, 75% of IKEA’s global operations were powered by renewable electricity, and its Ingka Investments arm has committed a total of €7.5 billion to wind and solar projects to power the business.

IKEA is electrifying its delivery fleet as well, rolling out electric vehicles for home deliveries to cut emissions. These efforts support the retailer’s broader climate goals, including a 50% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions across its value chain by 2030 (relative to 2016 levels) and reaching net-zero emissions by 2050.

Engaging with local communities is another priority. “In 2024, IKEA supported over 81,000 people through community programmes and expanded efforts in refugee employment and biodiversity,” notes Karen Pflug, IKEA’s Chief Sustainability Officer, in an interview with World Finance.

In the United States, IKEA even designed and donated a small sustainable home to a community village in Texas for vulnerable residents, using “trauma-informed design” principles to make it supportive and welcoming.

Experts often cite IKEA as a leader in corporate sustainability.

“They don’t shy away from the tough conversations, including the role that affordable goods play in driving overconsumption. Instead, they tackle it head-on with initiatives like sourcing FSC-certified wood, improving product durability, and experimenting with circular models. I also appreciate their transparency: they openly share the challenges they face and invite feedback, which is key to building trust and real progress,” Cross said.

A key focus for IKEA is now making sustainable living easy and affordable for customers.

“We know people want to take more climate action, but often face barriers like cost and convenience. We are focused on making sustainable living more accessible, through services like buy-back and resell, and by improving how we bring products and solutions that help people live more sustainably every day,” Pflug said.

In the coming years, IKEA looks poised to continue forging a more sustainable path, proving that even a global retailer known for low-cost convenience can embrace green innovation.

Renault: Reinventing mobility with purpose

At Renault’s iconic Refactory facility in France, used vehicles are repaired, retrofitted, and recycled as part of a circular approach to automotive manufacturing. French automaker Renault is working to reconcile cars and sustainability. In 2021, it opened the Refactory in Flins, Europe’s first circular economy factory dedicated to mobility.

This facility focuses on extending vehicle lifespans through what Renault calls a “retrofit, re-energy, recycle and restart” programme. At the Refactory, Renault repairs and refurbishes used cars and electric vehicle batteries, retrofits older vehicles with electric drivetrains, and recycles materials, creating a closed-loop system to reduce waste.

Renault has also set ambitious climate goals: achieving carbon neutrality in Europe by 2040 (and globally by 2050). A big part of this is electrification; the company expects 90% of its vehicle sales in Europe to be electric by 2030.

Progress is underway: Renault’s overall carbon footprint fell by 28% between 2010 and 2023. In 2022, it launched The Future is NEUTRAL, an initiative to expand recycling and reuse across the industry as part of a push toward “resource neutrality.”

Renault is steadily increasing recycled content in its new models as well. The electric Scenic E-Tech SUV introduced in 2024 contains about 25% recycled materials in its parts, and overall, 90% of the vehicle’s mass is designed to be recyclable.

The upcoming Renault 5 E-Tech city car, launching in 2025, is engineered to have a 35% lower carbon footprint in manufacturing than its predecessor (the Renault Zoe) by 2030.

Even biodiversity is on Renault’s radar. The company has a project in Thailand (with its tyre supplier Michelin), training local farmers in agroforestry to reduce the impact of rubber production on forests.

While the auto industry as a whole has a long road ahead to reach true sustainability, Renault is demonstrating how a legacy carmaker can begin to drive change through innovation and circular thinking.

Apple: Carbon neutral by design

Apple’s latest “Apple Watch” models include the company’s first carbon-neutral products, identified by a special green logo on their packaging. Consumer electronics giant Apple, not historically known for its eco-friendliness, is now making significant moves toward sustainability.

In April 2025, Apple announced it had slashed its overall greenhouse gas emissions by over 60% compared to 2015 levels, marking major progress toward its pledge to be carbon neutral across its business (including its supply chain) by 2030.

Apple introduced its first fully carbon-neutral products in 2023, several models of the Apple Watch, by cutting product emissions roughly 75% and offsetting the rest with high-quality carbon credits, which are invested in forest conservation.

Later in 2023, Apple released a carbon-neutral version of its Mac Mini computer (built with over 50% recycled content), and in early 2025, it unveiled a new MacBook Air made with over 55% recycled content.

The tech company has aggressively pushed the use of recycled and responsibly sourced materials. All Apple-designed batteries now use 99% recycled cobalt, reducing reliance on newly mined minerals.

To keep old devices out of landfills, the Apple Trade In programme offers consumers credit for turning in used devices, which Apple then refurbishes or recycles.

Apple’s latest Environmental Progress Report highlights other milestones: every Apple facility worldwide has been powered by 100% renewable energy since 2018, and that commitment is spreading to suppliers. Apple’s suppliers have brought 17.8 gigawatts of clean energy online around the world to power their operations.

Apple is also investing in clean energy projects to match the electricity that customers use to charge their devices, through its Power for Impact programme supporting renewable energy in communities from the Philippines and Thailand to South Africa.

The company is likewise backing natural carbon removal through its Restore Fund, which finances projects like reforestation of the Atlantic Forest in Brazil, now filled with native tree species that might otherwise have been lost.

Apple is also tackling waste and water in its supply chain: in 2024 alone, suppliers diverted around 600,000 metric tons of waste from landfills, and since 2013, the Supplier Clean Water Programme has saved over 90 billion gallons of water through recycling.

There is more work ahead, but Apple’s progress shows how innovation can drive sustainability even in a resource-intensive industry, all while the company continues to thrive. Notably, Apple’s revenue grew by more than 65% during the same period that its emissions were reduced by 60%, illustrating that profitability and sustainability can go hand in hand.

As Gen Z and younger consumers increasingly make purchase decisions based on their values, the efforts of companies like Apple, IKEA, and Patagonia to put the planet alongside profit may well become the new standard for long-term business success.

A new paradigm for corporate responsibility

The case studies of Patagonia, IKEA, Renault, and Apple offer a compelling narrative: a new business paradigm is taking root. This shift is neither cosmetic nor performative; it is structural, intentional, and increasingly non-negotiable.

In an era where global temperatures are rising and resource depletion is accelerating, sustainability is no longer a competitive advantage; it is a baseline expectation.

What differentiates the brands highlighted in this article is not merely that they are reducing harm, but that they are redesigning their models to actively regenerate, restore, and rethink what responsible capitalism can look like.

This shift is underpinned by three interlocking forces: rising consumer consciousness, tightening regulatory frameworks, and the changing values of the emerging workforce. Gen Z and Millennials don’t just speak out about climate issues; they use their buying power, social media influence, and job choices to support companies that take real action.

The fact that 73% of Gen Z is willing to pay more for sustainable products is not just a trend; it’s an inflexion point. These generations will soon dominate both market demand and global employment, creating a feedback loop that reinforces sustainability as a core business imperative.

Regulators, too, are sharpening their focus. Frameworks such as the European Union’s Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) are setting higher standards for accountability. Voluntary ESG pledges are giving way to mandatory disclosures and legally enforceable targets.

This ensures that sustainability is no longer the domain of well-meaning corporate social responsibility teams but of CEOs, CFOs, and boards who are being held financially and reputationally accountable for long-term environmental impact.

Equally significant is the cultural shift occurring within many of these companies. For years, sustainability was treated as a marketing concern, external-facing and often limited to optics. That has changed. Today, the brands leading the charge are embedding sustainability into their supply chains, innovation pipelines, employee incentives, and financial planning.

IKEA’s resale programmes, Patagonia’s activist ownership model, Renault’s circular economy factories, and Apple’s green product design aren’t isolated acts; they’re ecosystemic. They demonstrate a commitment to transforming not just products, but the very processes and philosophies that underpin their existence.

There is also a growing recognition that solving the climate crisis requires collective intelligence and cross-sector collaboration. Apple partnering with forestry initiatives in Brazil, IKEA engaging refugee communities, or Renault working with Michelin in Thailand on agroforestry. These are not charity projects, but investments in system resilience. They show a more mature approach to business, where environmental and social issues are closely connected to financial success.

However, challenges continue to persist. Greenwashing is still prevalent, particularly in industries where accountability is lacking and consumer education is insufficient. The real risk is in performative sustainability—branding that overstates its environmental efforts and carbon offsets that disguise rather than actually reduce emissions. Consumers, regulators, and watchdogs must continue to scrutinise such claims. Transparency, third-party verification, and measurable impact are critical in maintaining credibility.

Additionally, there are structural contradictions that companies must grapple with. Can a business model built on selling ever more products truly be sustainable? How do we reconcile economic growth with planetary boundaries? While circularity, carbon-neutral goals, and renewable energy use are important steps, deeper questions about consumption, inequality, and ecological regeneration remain. It is here that the next frontier of corporate sustainability lies.

Looking forward, we are likely to see three major developments: integrated value accounting, stakeholder governance, and decentralised innovation.

Companies will move beyond quarterly profits to account for their environmental and social externalities. Metrics like biodiversity impact, water usage, and material circularity will become part of mainstream reporting, supported by tools such as the Science-Based Targets initiative (SBTi) and the Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures (TNFD).

Shareholder primacy will continue to be challenged by models that emphasise stakeholder value. Employee ownership, along with community investment and long-term stewardship, as seen in Patagonia’s ownership structure, will become more prevalent, especially as activist investors and ESG-oriented funds gain influence.

As climate risks become more localised, companies will adopt region-specific sustainability strategies. This means empowering local teams, decentralising supply chains, and partnering with indigenous knowledge systems to co-create solutions that are both effective and equitable.

As this shift gathers pace, it will be remembered not just as a response to climate catastrophe, but as the dawn of a more conscious, connected, and courageous form of commerce. A new chapter in capitalism is being written, one where responsibility is not a burden but a source of innovation, resilience, and ultimately, relevance.

The post Sustainability: Profitable for the planet appeared first on International Finance.