Washington’s USD 3 billion minerals bet and the chokehold it cannot buy its way out of

The occasion was a USD 3 billion federal package for critical minerals and battery projects, presented as a repair job on defence supply chains worn thin by the Iran conflict.

The specifics were not trivial. The Pentagon’s Office of Strategic Capital extended a USD 1.4 billion conditional loan to Sila Nanotechnologies, which makes lithium-ion battery materials, a USD 400 million conditional loan to scandium producer Sunrise Energy Metals and USD 150 million to magnet developer Niron Magnetics.

Executives from MP Materials, Lithium Americas, NioCorp, Energy Fuels and deep-sea venture American Ocean Minerals filled the room. One handed the President a gold replica of a seabed nodule, another magnets made in Texas for General Motors.

The theatre was good. The arithmetic beneath it is harder.

The dependence is not about rocks
Start with the scale of the problem, because it is routinely understated. The US Geological Survey’s Mineral Commodity Summaries for 2026 found that the United States was fully import-dependent for 16 non-fuel mineral commodities and more than half dependent for 54 of them, a deterioration on the previous year.

China is a leading supplier for 14 of the 33 critical minerals on which America leans hardest. For eight of them, including antimony, graphite, arsenic and rare earths, Chinese material accounts for more than half of US imports.

The crucial point is that this is only partly a geology problem. China holds about 44 million tonnes of rare earth reserves, roughly half the world total, so its resource advantage is real.

But Brazil sits on 21 million tonnes and Vietnam on 22 million, against barely two million in the United States. What China holds almost outright is the middle of the chain.

Mine output runs near 69% of the world total against refining capacity near 90%. It also mines close to 80% of the world’s tungsten and just under half its antimony.

Separation, metallisation and magnet-making are chemically fiddly, capital-hungry and unglamorous, and China spent four decades and enormous subsidy building that capacity while everyone else outsourced it.

ALSO READ | Abu Dhabi’s ADQ, Trump administration to invest in USD 1.8 billion critical minerals fund

So the exposure runs through everything. Fighter jet actuators, missile guidance packages, submarine and radar systems, electric vehicle motors, wind turbines, data centre hardware, fibre optics, medical imaging and the polishing compounds used inside semiconductor fabs all trace back through the same handful of Chinese refineries.

The International Energy Agency modelled full implementation of the suspended controls in July and put USD 6.5 trillion a year of downstream production outside China at risk, with cars, transport and electronics carrying almost 85% of that exposure.

How Beijing turned a licence into a lever
China has never needed an embargo. It needs a licensing desk.

The current phase began in April 2025, when Beijing imposed export controls on seven rare earth elements including samarium, terbium, dysprosium, scandium and yttrium, a direct answer to US tariffs.

In October it widened the list to europium, holmium, erbium, thulium and ytterbium, and introduced extraterritorial provisions asserting authority over foreign-made goods containing Chinese-origin material.

The second wave was suspended betwween November 7-10 November 2026, after a bilateral truce, a move that demonstrated the system’s real value. It can be dialled up and down without ever being dismantled.

Through 2026 the ratchet has kept turning. Early in the year Beijing aimed dual-use restrictions at Japanese military end-users. In March the State Council issued provisions folding export controls, investment screening and counter-sanctions into a single supply chain security regime.

On June 22 the commerce ministry restricted 10 US companies, MP Materials and USA Rare Earth among them, barring anyone anywhere from supplying them with Chinese-origin dual-use goods, a precisely aimed strike at the two firms Washington is banking on.

By 24 July it had blocked shipments to 14 European Union firms. A reporting and reward mechanism for suspected violations took effect on 1 July, shifting the regime from licensing towards active enforcement, and Japanese nationals have already been detained in Dalian over alleged rare earth smuggling.

The market effects are not theoretical. Antimony prices rose 144% in 2025. European carmakers suspended production lines in June and October, and one assessment found magnet licence approval rates falling from above 90% to below a quarter.

ALSO READ | IF Insights: The future runs on minerals, not just oil or data

A European Chamber survey put the cost to a single member firm above 250 million euros. And the Trump-Xi summit in May 2026 produced no rollback.

Washington’s earlier claim that China would effectively eliminate the controls quietly disappeared from the official language, replaced by a vaguer promise to address American concerns.

What Washington has actually built
To be fair to the administration, the response has been broader than a single announcement.

Executive Order 14241 in March 2025 began accelerating mine permitting. In February 2026 came Project Vault, a roughly USD 12 billion strategic critical minerals reserve funded by a USD 10 billion Export-Import Bank loan, the largest in the bank’s history, plus close to USD 2 billion in private capital.

Structured as a public-private stockpile with fixed-price offtake, it lets manufacturers hedge price risk in a way none could alone, and doubles as a demand anchor helping new projects reach financial close.

Two days later the State Department hosted the first Critical Minerals Ministerial, drawing 54 countries. Out of that week came a Mexico action plan, a Democratic Republic of Congo copper and cobalt partnership, and frameworks or memoranda with Argentina, Morocco, Peru, the Philippines, the UAE, Uzbekistan, Guinea and Ecuador. Development finance commitments included USD 565 million for Brazilian rare earth extraction, a letter of intent worth up to USD 700 million for Kazakh tungsten, USD 600 million into the Orion consortium and seed money in Ukraine.

Frameworks with Australia and Japan carry explicit price floor cooperation, an attempt to stop Beijing undercutting Western producers into bankruptcy. A Quad minerals initiative followed in May 2026, an EU partnership in April.

Trade policy has been held in reserve rather than fired. Proclamation 11001 in January 2026 accepted Commerce’s finding that imported processed minerals threaten national security, then declined to impose tariffs, instructing negotiators to extract supply agreements first. The tariff remains loaded.

ALSO READ | Latin America’s emerging minerals battleground

Domestically, the government has taken equity as well as lending, including the Pentagon’s USD 400 million preferred stake in MP Materials and a USD 725 million loan to Energy Fuels.

Mountain Pass produced a record 2,599 tonnes of neodymium-praseodymium in 2025 and 917 tonnes in the first quarter of 2026 alone, up 63% year on year. USA Rare Earth spent USD 2.8 billion buying Brazil’s Serra Verde. New separation plants are rising in Texas, Louisiana, Oklahoma and Utah.

Can America actually be the mineral superpower?
Not on this decade’s early timetable, and the numbers say so plainly.

American demand for neodymium-iron-boron magnets reached roughly 48,000 tonnes in 2025. Domestic supply was about 300 tonnes. Even if capacity hits the projected 5,000 tonnes by the end of this year, that is barely a tenth of national demand.

MP’s Independence plant runs at 3,000 tonnes, and its 10X facility is not due to begin commissioning until 2028, taking combined capacity to 10,000 tonnes around 2030.

Against that sits a statutory cliff. From January 1 2027, defence contractors cannot use rare earth magnets, tantalum or tungsten if any stage of production, from mining through refining and metallisation, touched China, Russia, Iran or North Korea. Suppliers have said flatly that they will not be ready.

Heavy rare earths such as dysprosium and terbium, the ones that keep magnets working inside jet engines and missile seekers, are the sharpest gap of all, and Chinese metallisation capacity there is close to total.

ALSO READ | Pax Silica: The new global order

Nor is the domestic effort uniformly disciplined. MP Materials sued USA Rare Earth on 22 May 2026 over alleged theft of magnet formulations, naming a former MP engineer and a third-party firm alongside it, a fight between the two companies Washington needs most.

USA Rare Earth denies every allegation. Congressional Democrats have demanded documents on the equity stakes programme, asking whether government ownership might sway permitting decisions. As one executive put it to the trade press, the 2026 to 2028 narrative is political and the 2030-plus timeline is industrial.

The realistic read is this. Washington can plausibly secure defence-grade volumes by the early 2030s, and Project Vault buys time in the interim.

Displacing China across the civilian economy, where it competes on price rather than on national security grounds, is a project measured in decades. Money was always the easy part. Chemistry, permits, trained metallurgists and time are not for sale.